all 2 comments

[–]thefirststone 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't get it. He says this is to "appease the individuals in power", but how? He doesn't say.

It will all be archived now, out of necessity, so he has no plausible deniability that he didn't write his articles. There exist web hosts keeping more-controversial material online. There exist alternate ways to distribute articles, too.

What is this hysterical crap?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, he is #1 on the FDA's "take down" list.

I didn't always agree with him, but I will miss his info.