you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AuricChicken[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I find it weird how the only Asian nations that are global partners of NATO are Japan, South Korea and Mongolia. Geographically, all East Asian Nations. So only China and North Korea are not a part of NATO in EA. What's your thoughts on this?

[–]GoldenDynasty 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think its not great that they are, but to get a better picture we should try to analyze their individual actions, especially since they are considered "partners" and not actually part of NATO. For example, Turkey and Hungaria are actually a part of NATO and has participated in nato drills and projects, but they've been acting like a huge thorn on the west's back recently, as well as refusing to sanction Russia, along with increasing its cooperation and participating with it. Furthermore, the population of Turkey has one of the highest anti americuck sentiments. Another example is Saudi who's always been regarded as a strong ally of the west, done numerous cooperations with them in regards to military, and yet essentially kicked biden and america in the balls by announcing the effective end of the petrodollar by attempting to deal oil trade settlements in currencies other than the USD (particularly in the yuan and ruble). India is a part of the QUAD, and its the same story with them. Finally, Russia and Putin itself has asked multiple times to be a part of NATO in the early 2000s, and only became a powerful threat to their interests after he realized that NATO would always regard them as the enemy no matter how much they capitulate. So the common theme here is that despite being (sometimes) very closely aligned and participating with NATO, these countries are examples of those that are still going to look after their own interests first, and refuse to be used as cannon fodder, so you can say the big picture view of their societies is not as bad.

Going back to the examples of east asian nations, again Japan and (possibly) ROK stands out here in a negative light, for all the reasons we've stated before. Japan's government seems more and more likely that they WANT to be used as cannon fodder similar to the government of Taiwan. Furthermore, Japan itself wants to be part of NATO. Mongolia's situation, despite having a high amount of pro americuck sentiment and participating with NATO, is still not as bad in comparison for all the reasons I've said before. Plus, they've even recently participated in numerous miltiary and defense cooperations and agreements with China and Russia. So if they wanted to fully align themselves with NATO and be their pawns like Japan, why would they do that? I'll also have you to note that while Mongolia is regarded as East Asian in some sources geographically, Central Asian culture and mentality is very different from East Asian (not saying its better or superior, just that there might be a significant amount of things they wont have in common with each other), unless the central asian group is living in east asia such as some minorities in China. Technically the most based golden nation as of now is East Asian actually (DPRK).

Singapore is another case study. They buy western weapons, tech, and cooperate with the west in terms of military drills and training, but they also balance it out by maintaining positive relations with the Eastern bloc, particularly China. This is a very traditional tactic of Asian countries. They try to stay neutral and see how they can benefit and grow themselves better while using two opposing superpowers to provide them funding, military training and development, it also allows them to hedge their bets and pressure the two opposing superpowers to get what they want. Like you've said before, there is still some element of mistrust between Asian naions after what groups like the ija did, and there is a particularly significant element of mistrust on China as well. But they still acknowledge that China is an important trading and economic superpower, that could bring them benefits, along with the fact that getting used as a pawn by amerikkka is not a great idea.

The fact that places like Japan, Taiwan, and possibly ROK governments dont understand or are forced to go against even basic common sense in terms of survival is a bad sign for them. And as you've mentioned before, it was supposed to be asian ameridork's responsibility to raise awareness about these issues to native asians, instead of acting as a pozzing agent in asia and as a huge,useless, whiny, hapafied, incel burden for native asians to have to constantly carry on their backs. Perhaps other western diaspora asians such as commonwealth asians (Canada, Oceania, maybe UK, etc) can step up to the plate instead and seize the voice of narrative away from the huge, useless asian amerifaggot community

[–]AuricChicken[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yea, great points. I notice Pakistan is also a partner and that country hates Mericucks.

Asian Americucks (Especially the cucks in the u.s.a) own most of the platforms in the West and have the most dominant voices for obvious reasons. Australia/NZ Asians basically live in on an island in comparison. And there are even less EA/SEAs in the UK. They are just as bad as Asian Americucks anyway.