"Objectivity Has Got To Go": Westoid News Leaders Call For End Of Objective Journalism

submitted by GoldenDynasty from zerohedge.com

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]TwerKing 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No objectivity means absence of morals and not being able to do any true justice.

Their motive is to keep slandering golden men while misinforming others much easier. This is the real reason why they don't care about objectivity anymore. To them, "social justice" does not include the abuse goldens went through and the reparations westoids owe us.

I wonder how it will play out from now on.

All I know is this would only hurt those westoid news outlets in the long run, although it doesn't take a genius to see that coming. Lol.

Funny to see the low depths they'll go as they become more desperate.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I knew people and society were liars since I was a kid. This much has always been clear to me. The more they need to lie, the more it proves what a threat Asian men are. They continue to show their own weakness with their terrible behavior.

[–]GoldenDynasty[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Now, former executive editor for The Washington Post Leonard Downie Jr. and former CBS News President Andrew Heyward have released the results of their interviews with over 75 media leaders and concluded that objectivity is now considered reactionary and even harmful. Emilio Garcia-Ruiz, editor-in-chief at the San Francisco Chronicle said it plainly: “Objectivity has got to go.”

[–]GoldenDynasty[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Stanford journalism professor, Ted Glasser, insisted that journalism needed to “free itself from this notion of objectivity to develop a sense of social justice.” He rejected the notion that journalism is based on objectivity and said that he views “journalists as activists because journalism at its best — and indeed history at its best — is all about morality.” Thus, “Journalists need to be overt and candid advocates for social justice, and it’s hard to do that under the constraints of objectivity.”

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

journalists as activists because journalism at its best — and indeed history at its best — is all about morality.”

Lmao what a straight up bald faced lie.

Fucking Freemasons

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As I said, neoliberalism is just fascism and thinly veiled Naziism. Their only "claim" to being progressive? LGBT. But if you look at the history of fascism (the Third Reich, or ancient Rome), LGBT is status quo. Not progress.

Nothing has changed since the early days of the America empire. It's always been this same thing.

Get it through your heads: organized high level homosexuality rules EVERYTHING.