you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're asking the wrong person, because I'm skeptical about nukes.

Here's General Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and other scientists examining the site of the Trinity test (at the base).

Where are the scorch marks? Where is the crater???

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yep, that pic is BS. Of course it is. Nobody could stand at ground zero of a nuke, not for a long time afterward. I don't know, all we know for certain is that IT FIT THEIR AGENDA to show THAT particular picture.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yep, that pic is BS. Of course it is. Nobody could stand at ground zero of a nuke, not for a long time afterward.

I'm not so sure it's as dangerous as they claim.

Here's an interesting documentary video that strongly suggests the actual dangers of nuclear fallout and radiation are exaggerated.
It covers in detail the known long-term impacts of exposure of Chernobyl and Fukashima.

Fukushima and Chernobyl: Myth versus Reality

Spoiler:

  • Families not notified of the Chernobyl accident had children with thyroid cancer from radioactive iodine.
  • Those directly exposed to the blast had serious injuries, and many died.
  • Others exposed directly to the site were tracked for decades.
  • Some died of cancer, but surprisingly few.
  • No other major health effects were identified/reported.

Fukashima:
* Almost everyone at the event walked it off. * No significant increase in health effects.

Now we could infer a number of things, but they fall into two opposing categories:

Maybe it was covered up:
* Health records doctored
* Crisis actors/impostors pretending to be the people involved at the events

Maybe it was all a hoax:
* Fallout is not dangerous (as indicated by Nagasaki and Hiroshima)
* Ukranian families may have been intentionally given iodine contaminated milk (in the localized area) to perpetuate the hoax
* This explains the lack of health impacts from Fukashima
* Also justifies Japanese govt moving families back to the area because former insiders are no longer willing to perpetuate the anti-nuclear (cheap energy) psyop, but won't publically state

Food for thought.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or, they aren't nuclear power plants, but free energy plants disguised as nuclear facilities. But what about the people working there? They're handling harmless stuff with "caution radioactive" plastered all over these things? Could be!

I mean, let's face it: besides breeding reactors, why on Earth would the world's top honchos allow nuclear power plants to be built when in fact they are in possession of Nikola Tesla's free energy tech?