Did you know a nuclear bomb was detonated in Yemen in 2015?

submitted by [deleted] from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I'm only talking about the 0:19 to 0:21 sequence. Nothing else.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Bro. I think I see what you're pointing out.

Unfortunately, it's all centered in the middle of the most suspiciously altered videos of all time.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I'm plenty sure if you look at other "versions" of that same video, the UFO isn't there.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'm not trying to hate on the nukes/UFO story.

Just shining some light on some suspicious details.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Since you know them so well, which test would you say that was? The first US thermonuke?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're asking the wrong person, because I'm skeptical about nukes.

Here's General Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and other scientists examining the site of the Trinity test (at the base).

Where are the scorch marks? Where is the crater???

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yep, that pic is BS. Of course it is. Nobody could stand at ground zero of a nuke, not for a long time afterward. I don't know, all we know for certain is that IT FIT THEIR AGENDA to show THAT particular picture.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you familiar with Galen Windsor?

Also, they could easily stand at the ground zero of a hoax PsyOp; which deliberately intended to eliminate major wars between "the great powers".

This actually happened, and the photo is credited as legit.

As legit as any nuke video (more legit actually); given the presence of Oppenheimer, and the senior brass.

Maybe aliens also intervened. I can't prove it didn't happen.

Is this acceptable middle ground.

Also, virtually all of the senior physicist belonged to a certain tribe who have been rumored to misrepresent certain historical events.
Another interesting detail that adds plausibility.

Also, the Japanese didn't respond to the "nuke" attacks in any unusual way. As if, nothing unusual occurred; beyond the war crime of civilian firebombing.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh I agree that Hiroshima & Nagasaki were firebombed. Well, I could see them dropping nukes on there, and then wonder why they're not going off. ALIENS. Then plan B: firebomb the hell outta the place, claim it was nuked, then go back to the drawing board, trying to figure out "what went wrong" or "why the UFOs prevented us from annihilating hundreds of thousands in THIS particular manner" and instead have them resort to murdering them much more personally and individually.

It probably has to do with a clause of RESPONSIBILITY for one's actions. Drop a nuke, who's responsible for that huge number of deaths? The dude that pressed the button? The dude who gave the order? Shared responsibility of course, but that's a darn few people to spread it between them. With firebombing, the karma attribution becomes both clearer and less problematic.

And yes, this is acceptable middle ground. But I never negotiate: I say my viewpoint, is all. ;-)

Whether nukes exist but can't get used in warfare because aliens won't allow it, or they don't and are made up, either way the footage looks fake and is used to instill terror into the populations out of thin air. There is no danger.

Oh and isn't that terrorism to begin with.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yep, that pic is BS. Of course it is. Nobody could stand at ground zero of a nuke, not for a long time afterward.

I'm not so sure it's as dangerous as they claim.

Here's an interesting documentary video that strongly suggests the actual dangers of nuclear fallout and radiation are exaggerated.
It covers in detail the known long-term impacts of exposure of Chernobyl and Fukashima.

Fukushima and Chernobyl: Myth versus Reality

Spoiler:

  • Families not notified of the Chernobyl accident had children with thyroid cancer from radioactive iodine.
  • Those directly exposed to the blast had serious injuries, and many died.
  • Others exposed directly to the site were tracked for decades.
  • Some died of cancer, but surprisingly few.
  • No other major health effects were identified/reported.

Fukashima:
* Almost everyone at the event walked it off. * No significant increase in health effects.

Now we could infer a number of things, but they fall into two opposing categories:

Maybe it was covered up:
* Health records doctored
* Crisis actors/impostors pretending to be the people involved at the events

Maybe it was all a hoax:
* Fallout is not dangerous (as indicated by Nagasaki and Hiroshima)
* Ukranian families may have been intentionally given iodine contaminated milk (in the localized area) to perpetuate the hoax
* This explains the lack of health impacts from Fukashima
* Also justifies Japanese govt moving families back to the area because former insiders are no longer willing to perpetuate the anti-nuclear (cheap energy) psyop, but won't publically state

Food for thought.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or, they aren't nuclear power plants, but free energy plants disguised as nuclear facilities. But what about the people working there? They're handling harmless stuff with "caution radioactive" plastered all over these things? Could be!

I mean, let's face it: besides breeding reactors, why on Earth would the world's top honchos allow nuclear power plants to be built when in fact they are in possession of Nikola Tesla's free energy tech?