Did you know a nuclear bomb was detonated in Yemen in 2015?

submitted by [deleted] from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

You're looking at an UFO examining the blast from up close. They're altering those movies because of the UFOs they want to hide. This sample from the archives was taken from the 'wrong' pile or something, because the UFO is visible. UFOs have visited EVERY. SINGLE. nuclear detonation.

You must be able to question your beliefs when presented with evidence that they might be wrong. If you are unwilling to do this, then I don't see what we can discuss. Ever.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

That looks like an artifact of the cloudy sky overlay that was the last remnant of the disappearing clouds.

Slow the video down to ~25% and it's pretty clear that the disappearing clouds were horizontally shaped, and this was the last cloud removed.

You must be able to question your beliefs when presented with evidence that they might be wrong. If you are unwilling to do this, then I don't see what we can discuss. Ever.

I'm surprised you would put such extreme conditions on our conversations.

I watched the video you made. That's the first nuke scene. Here's the next series of scenes.

1 disappearing clouds nuke.
2. A sunrise through the clouds (the clouds are an overlay, so the don't move. Some are added to the scene half way through.).
3. I'm not sure what they're filming. Probably similar to #5 with a different angle, and more slow motion.
4. Also not sure what this is? The clouds under it don't move.
A overlay of static dark clouds at the bottom. Smoke above it for effect.
There's no texture to the smoke. Looks fake AF.
5. A slow motion recording of a large volume of gas rising through a liquid (cooking oil, water, I'm not sure, but you can see the separated bubbles floating through).
Filmed from the side. Colorized.
6. A super bright orange nuke, that is so intensely bright and luminous that there is a clearly defined shadow cast upon the ground from the sun. 😑

If these superheated events we happening then the mushroom cloud should glow like carbon soot glows inside a flame.

Instead it's a cold gray smoke color.

Plus a bunch of scenes filmed to pretend like they're filming or witnessing something.

Why would they make a point of filming people film the nuke?
Where are the multiples of copies of these nuke recordings?

I'm open to considering alternatives.

I evaluate and analyze my beliefs on a regular basis.
Nothing is hammered into our minds like nuclear war and nukes.... so why do these videos look so weird, edited, and staged?

Edit. Please go to 0:44 seconds into the film and pause.

There's a scene where a film camera is positioned in front of a projection screen.
There is a nuke video being projected onto the screen, and the reflection is reflecting upon the lighting up the front side of the camera.

How does this make any sense?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

I'm only talking about the 0:19 to 0:21 sequence. Nothing else.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Bro. I think I see what you're pointing out.

Unfortunately, it's all centered in the middle of the most suspiciously altered videos of all time.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

I'm plenty sure if you look at other "versions" of that same video, the UFO isn't there.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do you happen to notice all of the additional details that I'm pointing out?

The film overlays? The bubbles? The clouds? Etc.?

I can sorta see what you're identifying, but I'm distracted by the... Um... other stuff.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In that 2-second segment you mean?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Did you slow down the video? If you watch these in slow motion they quickly fall apart.

The hoaxters didn't anticipate computers and slowing the frame rate.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The two-second sequence that I pointed you to is THE ONLY PART of this video that I consider.

OF COURSE footage is edited and doctored. I THOROUGHLY AGREE with that. There is no denying it. I'm not fighting you on this, I know this for myself already. They all look odd.

But just you watch this space, now that informing people about the reality of UFOs is on the agenda, they will declassify THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE with strange lights zooming around the test explosions.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'm not trying to hate on the nukes/UFO story.

Just shining some light on some suspicious details.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Since you know them so well, which test would you say that was? The first US thermonuke?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're asking the wrong person, because I'm skeptical about nukes.

Here's General Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and other scientists examining the site of the Trinity test (at the base).

Where are the scorch marks? Where is the crater???

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yep, that pic is BS. Of course it is. Nobody could stand at ground zero of a nuke, not for a long time afterward. I don't know, all we know for certain is that IT FIT THEIR AGENDA to show THAT particular picture.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you familiar with Galen Windsor?

Also, they could easily stand at the ground zero of a hoax PsyOp; which deliberately intended to eliminate major wars between "the great powers".

This actually happened, and the photo is credited as legit.

As legit as any nuke video (more legit actually); given the presence of Oppenheimer, and the senior brass.

Maybe aliens also intervened. I can't prove it didn't happen.

Is this acceptable middle ground.

Also, virtually all of the senior physicist belonged to a certain tribe who have been rumored to misrepresent certain historical events.
Another interesting detail that adds plausibility.

Also, the Japanese didn't respond to the "nuke" attacks in any unusual way. As if, nothing unusual occurred; beyond the war crime of civilian firebombing.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yep, that pic is BS. Of course it is. Nobody could stand at ground zero of a nuke, not for a long time afterward.

I'm not so sure it's as dangerous as they claim.

Here's an interesting documentary video that strongly suggests the actual dangers of nuclear fallout and radiation are exaggerated.
It covers in detail the known long-term impacts of exposure of Chernobyl and Fukashima.

Fukushima and Chernobyl: Myth versus Reality

Spoiler:

  • Families not notified of the Chernobyl accident had children with thyroid cancer from radioactive iodine.
  • Those directly exposed to the blast had serious injuries, and many died.
  • Others exposed directly to the site were tracked for decades.
  • Some died of cancer, but surprisingly few.
  • No other major health effects were identified/reported.

Fukashima:
* Almost everyone at the event walked it off. * No significant increase in health effects.

Now we could infer a number of things, but they fall into two opposing categories:

Maybe it was covered up:
* Health records doctored
* Crisis actors/impostors pretending to be the people involved at the events

Maybe it was all a hoax:
* Fallout is not dangerous (as indicated by Nagasaki and Hiroshima)
* Ukranian families may have been intentionally given iodine contaminated milk (in the localized area) to perpetuate the hoax
* This explains the lack of health impacts from Fukashima
* Also justifies Japanese govt moving families back to the area because former insiders are no longer willing to perpetuate the anti-nuclear (cheap energy) psyop, but won't publically state

Food for thought.