all 4 comments

[–]Femaleisnthateful 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus. Just another way gender ideology subverts public health measures. Why do these women think these rules are supposed to apply to them, anyway? Do they really think that gender feels increase one's risk of STDs?

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The funny thing, I read somewhere that the reason why hey discriminate homo and sexually active men because the anus does not resist the STI as well as the vaginal canal. I think it's a stupid rule but I also suspect that they're really trying to make sure they don't consume all of their budget and resources for mass blood testing. It would ruin the blood if they having been taking hormones and crap and lie about it. I also read somewhere that a some people (I'm not a media expert, so I don't knownif it's exclusively women) need MALE blood specifically because there's a name only component in it which they need to survive (Note this was ages ago, but I remember seeing g it on gendercritical).

Discalimer: I'm not sure if they're actually discriminating against homosexuals or not, it was a claim, but I use to wonder why sexuality gets asked in the questionnaire.

[–]Apis 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They do test, but if the blood is drawn too soon after infection, it will be a false negative. That's why they try to exclude higher risk samples. Because biology doesn't care about feelings. So it's no wonder they don't grasp that the exclusion of sexually active gay men is based on biology and not nebulous feelings.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That actually makes more sense.