I quit Ovarit because of covert racism against BIPOC and AAPI women.

submitted by FrogEnjoyer from self.GenderCritical

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ku_va_nr 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

If you already struggle with real gender dysphoria, then Ovarit might not be the best place for you at first place.

In the past I would have suggested to see a professional, but since "affirmative gender care" is now an obligation, a professional will just push you to butcher your breast, take testosterone and satisfy your delusions of "becoming a male". I guess you should look at the result of some "phaloplasties" on the internet to see how ridicule and grotesque the so called women's penises look and ask yourself if you really want a useless lump of flesh between your legs to feel better in your body...

There's nothing wrong with disagreeing with someone else's views; everyone has different backgrounds and experiences.

Ovarit isn't a debate website. that's what radical feminism is. If you believe in "gender" at first place then again, it's pointless to be on Ovarit. Reddit might be a better place for you.

The whole "white feminism" thing has always been a troll used by modern intersectionalists to shut up radical feminists. It's high time radical feminists reject intersectionality, a flawed concept that allowed transexual activists, religious activists, pro-prostitution activists to hijack feminism by denouncing 2nd wave feminists as "privileged" or "non inclusive", the same old trick...

[–]FrogEnjoyer[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What's wrong with intersectionality? Or more specifically, what's preventing intersectionality from being compatible with radical feminism?

[–]ku_va_nr 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's wrong with intersectionality? Or more specifically, what's preventing intersectionality from being compatible with radical feminism?

well, maybe you're fine with the well being of TIMs, Muslim males, black males, pimps being considered ever before the well being of females. feminists invented intersectionality, then intersectionality made feminism a minor struggle and not "urgent" according to some so called "feminists" themselves and you don't see the problem with intersectionality?

Is it the duty of feminism to fight against "transphobia" or "islamophobia", or "racism" at the expense of the fight against misogyny and fighting sexual violence? Should a white woman shut up about her rape if a black man rapes her because "white women are privileged"? And you don't see the issue with "intersectionality"? that is that different intersectional struggles can be at odd with one another? after all trans rights can only be fulfilled if they walk all over women's rights.

Now you might argue, that's not what intersectionality is at first place, well it doesn't matter, that's what people who used intersectionality for their own agenda managed to turn intersectionality into. How is it that you're reclaiming that definition now? If you claim radical feminism is "diverse and inclusive", then "intersectionalists" will argue that it isn't inclusive of TIMs.

Don't you get it? That word is tainted.