you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlippyKing 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Is it? Kai seems to be asking for a gender-critical take on this variation of "gender-woo", not debate which would be GCdebatesQT (if that ever actually happened there), and it is too specific for the other two subs.

[–]Kai_Decadence[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You are correct. I wanted to get insight from gender critical take.

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I assume you share a gender critical take, that how you act or live is an individual's personality and is malleable, not some innate trait or identity that most be discovered separate from the outside reality, and our sex is simply that.

Am I correct? Or do you buy into the QT/tra view of things?

[–]Kai_Decadence[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No you are correct with the form, I don't think how you act or live as an individual through personality determines your sex. Gender as far as I'm concerned is just personality and/or demeanor. It doesn't change your sex. Biological sex is immutable and cannot change. In short, no I don't buy into the QT/TRA view of things, I find it utter nonsense.