you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]soundsituation 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think so. It's the same as all the other posts: "here is something I heard a trans activist say, please tell me why it's wrong". The way it's worded always makes it sound like it's coming from a GC perspective but it's a call for refutation from the GC side. I do see your point about the hyper-specificity of the question, but literally anything is allowed on s/whatever, same for s/AskSaidit as long as it's a question.

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not saying it's not allowed there, but that the specificity of the topic places it here. Kai is asking for a GC perspective, not a debate. I don't think Kai wants more QT or Trans input on this topic. Who does, really?

[–]soundsituation 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think Kai wants more QT or Trans input on this topic.

Yes, this is my point. It's a representation of a gender ideologue's argument, with a call to the GC crowd for refutation. I don't know if you've read or participated in the debate sub but this is exactly the format that posts take over there: "Hey [either GC or QT], please refute this argument." That's why I believe this question is best suited to that sub. The other subs I listed are decent alternatives if OP would like wider engagement.

[–]Kai_Decadence[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Flippyking was right that I was looking to get a gender critical perspective and not a "Trans" perspective because I know it'll just more or less be the same. I wasn't looking for a debate, just a perspective since it was the first I got someone trying to answer the questions they usually can't answer.