you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nayenezgani 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

They claim it is necessary to include other axes of oppression like caste, class, ethnicity in the analysis of “gendered” oppression, lest feminist analysis becomes limited to upper-caste or white women.

Anti-racism was a MRA movement all along. Left-wing MRAs say that racism is really just covert misandry. What that really means, though, is that prejudice is the only way males can admit male defects. Rape is only a problem to males if they can accuse other groups of males that they don't like -- Syrian refugees, Catholic priests, and so on -- of being rapists.

If males were not racist to each other then they would mobilize against females as a class. I never cared about racism but now I care even less when I realized that. Racism is one of the few ways I can make myself socially superior to a male, not to mention racist comedy is pretty funny.

Edit: Wrong word.

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Women are affected by racism and other non sex-based forms of opression, too. Honestly, I don't think we can talk about prostitution and surrogacy without also adressing class, ethnicity and imperialism because it's the more oppressed women who are more likely to be affected by them.

I think the real reason "intersectional feminisnm" fails women it's because their advocates (who often come from a more privileged background) have the same interest in advancing other causes than they do in advancing feminism, i.e. zero. At best, it's all virtue signalling. At worst, it's a Trojan horse.

[–]Nayenezgani 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Honestly, I don't think we can talk about prostitution and surrogacy without also adressing class, ethnicity and imperialism because it's the more oppressed women who are more likely to be affected by them.

Most leftist causes -- anti-imperialism, anti-racism, anti-homophobia -- are really males being upset they're being relegated to female status, and anger at the fact they are not able to oppress females as effectively as the 1%.

I was never a radical feminist but Andrea Dworkin really understood that the left is not our friend.

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Liberals (assuming that is what you mean by left) are NOT anti-imperialist in any way. For goodness sake, the Democratic Party from the US is made up of a bunch of war-mongers like the Repulican one! Not to mention they are quite eager to export their insane idead about "gender identity" to the rest of the world. How anyone can take liberals' lies of being anti-imperialist seriously?

Honestly, it's uncredible that you apparently cannot see how women may also be hurt by those issues that you so easily dismiss.

[–]lefterfield 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Accurate. I wish leftist females could recognize this.