you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ShotTopic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm pretty sure The first message is from the moderators who imbedded a quote from OP in their message as a note for what the ban is for (I assume a comment on the sub). The bottom "So, you're, like, a rape apologist?" was sent from OP to /r/AreTheStraightsOK mods.

I'm assuming the context for OP's quoted comment is in regards to Chris Chan, hence the rape thing.

[–]SexualityCritical[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's correct. I pointed out that sending Chris-Chan to a female only prison (well, it's not really 'female only' when TIMs are sent, are they?) would increase the chances of him committing rape, and that his sexual orientation didn't really matter that much, as lesbians should be sent to female only prisons, and exclusively same-sex attracted TIMs should still be in male only prison facilities.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That makes more sense. I dropped my account before I could be banned, so I'm not really familiar with the process. It's obscene to me that they can arbitrarily ban people without even an explanation.