all 14 comments

[–]lefterfield 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Slate is not a credible source on this issue.

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They decided to pretend it's a hoax after their initial response of "Shut up, bigots! It's perfectly fine for a man to show his dick to little girls" didn't go over well.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Slate is references that LA gay magazine which claimed that the incident was a hoax. Ostensibly their evidence for this claim is that Wi Spa claims none of it's transgender patrons were there that day. I don't know why transactivists would be satisfied with the insinuation that this business tracks its trans customers, and no one can explain how they would even know.

Nothing about the video indicates that it was a hoax. It would have to involve a lot of people, given all the women who were seen having fled the spa area.

Also, if it was a hoax, why did SoCal Antifa post on Twitter about the terrible mistreatment this innocent transwoman allegedly received when organizing their violent counterprotest? If it never happened, then Antifa clearly did some hoaxing of their own, but no one wants to address that.

My understanding is that California protects 'gender identity' and that this spa would have no right to turn away a customer from the gendered area of their choice.

[–]whateverneverpine 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Wi Spa manager repeated your last point over and over to woman complaining (sorry her name escapes me, cubanangel on instagram I believe).

[–]whateverneverpine 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, it's not a hoax, see response of spa management.

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I doubt it is, but even if it were, the issue it is raising is still the same.

If women' s spaces allow males who identify as women, then it means that a locker room or a nudist spa for women allow males and their penis on display as well.

TRAs have said so themselves, "women" with a penis belong in women' s spaces, and that includes places like this. Then, when that didn' t gather the response they wanted, they started claiming that "it never happened". So are they saying that they aren' t supporting the idea that someone with a penis should be allowed in women' s spaces? Sounds pretty transphobic against the most oppressed category that ever exist and will ever exist to me...

Also, Slate has been kissing trans asses for a while, I wouldn' t trust them on anything remotely involving that topic,

[–]Rationalmind 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Rationalmind 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Baileyscheesecakes 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Even if it were a hoax, the fact remains that: the spa did nothing when told a man was in the women's area, and that women objected the spa did nothing when told there were young girls present people are defending the exposure of male genitalia in women's spaces people are defending the exposure of male genitalia in front of little girls

.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone still supporting leftist causes at this point, where you have so-called "anti-fascists" beating up women who they deem 'anti-pedophile', is lost.

[–]Cass 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

oh no the MSM lying about something. that never happened before.

[–]slushpilot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

File under "this never happens"