you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]one1won 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The claimant was arguing for trans women to be treated less favourably than non-trans women in the context of prison policy.

BS!

From another source:

Ultimately, whilst “the Claimant’s concerns were understandable”, Lord Justice Holroyde accepted the Defendant’s argument that there is “a margin of discretion” in striking the appropriate balance of competing rights.

And Men’s right to sex and to harass trumps any rights any woman may think she has. (I wish I were being sarcastic)

https://fairplayforwomen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FDJ-Press-Release-Final.pdf