you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]usehername 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Lmfao so you're continuing to assume I get my information from "feminist articles"? Here are the decades of research on the negative effects porn has on the brain, self-control, and attitudes towards women:

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/research/

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Lmfao so you're continuing to assume I get my information from "feminist articles"? Here are the decades of research on the negative effects porn has on the brain, self-control, and attitudes towards women:

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/research/

And I thought you were rational enough to think that I was just adding my input with zero assumptions (looks like I was wrong). I didn't know you are holding our last argument against me. I'm not wrong in my theory that there was probably a feminist researcher grasping bullshit to publish some work. If you want to interpet my comment that way, go ahead, but it wasn't related to the effects of porn.

You still haven't proven your other point. Also here's some advice, don't react to crass, baseless assumptions, you're feeding trolls like that and everyone is free to make assumptions, it's what they do with assumptions that matter.

Edit: Wording

[–]usehername 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Why are you on a hair trigger? You clearly understand that you were making an assumption:

don't react to crass, baseless assumptions,

and were disagreeing with my take that porn is a big reason why we've gone backwards:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap

So why deny it?

I didn't know you are holding our last argument against me.

I'm not, but I see a pattern emerging.

You still haven't proven your other point.

I just sent it. I was putting it off because I disagree with nearly everything you're saying, you keep (intentionally?) misrepresenting my argument, and don't understand what constitutes "proof".

everyone is free to make assumptions

Not if they're baseless and/or easily proven wrong.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Why are you on a hair trigger? You clearly understand that you were making an assumption

You're clearly projecting. I wasn't the one who decided to mention the previous argument and assumed the other party was disputing the relevancy of the impact of the porn industry. I was just sharing my thoughts and decided to give you advice because you seem to take what other people say so personally. Lighten up, I'm just someone you'll never meet in real life.

and were disagreeing with my take that porn is a big reason why we've gone backwards:

And how have I disagreed?

So why deny it?

Deny what? It looks more like you're imagining stuff.

I just sent it. I was putting it off because I disagree with nearly everything you're saying, you keep (intentionally?) misrepresenting my argument, and don't understand what constitutes "proof".

I just got it and read it. You still haven't proven the mechanisms. All you're doing is telling me how misogynistic males talk about women.

Not if they're baseless and/or easily proven wrong.

Someone has never told you the difference between making an assumption and acting on an assumption.

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I wasn't the one who decided to mention the previous argument and assumed the other party was disputing the relevancy of the impact of the porn industry.

Like I said, I see a pattern, and it's funny how you're still trying to deny that you were disagreeing.

What I said:

I think the rise of porn is a big reason why.

What you replied with after quoting the above:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap

You're clearly implying that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap, the bullcrap being that porn is one of the reasons why women's status has gone backwards in these past few decades.

Normally, I don't give up an argument but this one's clearly in bad faith. Lying and misrepresenting my argument repeatedly is a no from me.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Like I said, I see a pattern, and it's funny how you're still trying to deny that you were disagreeing.

I never was disagreeing (to clarify, about your comment on porn).

What you replied with after quoting the above:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap. I'm now wondering if you would have that same thought if I responded to you with a different username.

So, you have an issue with me not agreeing nor disagreeing and just posting a theory to add to your theory?

You're clearly implying that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap, the bullcrap being that porn is one of the reasons why women's status has gone backwards in these past few decades.

Technically, I proposed a theory and no, it was not related to porn, it was actually just me adding to a list of theories.

Edit: Wording

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It's really obvious you're lying. What you meant was obvious to absolutely everyone and I already spelled it out for you.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's really obvious you're lying. What you meant was obvious to absolutely everyone and I already spelled it out for you.

I didn't lie about anything and have no idea what you think I'm lying about (you're talking about that comment about the porn industry right? Ig so, state your accusatio, and if you think I lied, you have to prove it.

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The lie:

I never was disagreeing (to clarify, about your comment on porn).

The proof:

What I said:

I think the rise of porn is a big reason why.

What you replied with after quoting the above:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap

edit (addition):

And then:

I said:

Lmfao so you're continuing to assume I get my information from "feminist articles"?

I was clearly implying here that you were making a false assumption.

You said:

don't react to crass, baseless assumptions

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The lie:

I never was disagreeing (to clarify, about your comment on porn).

The proof:

What I said:

I think the rise of porn is a big reason why.

What you replied with after quoting the above:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap

Your "evidence" does not back up your accusation. How does my reply "disagree" with your comment?

And then:

I said:

Lmfao so you're continuing to assume I get my information from "feminist articles"?

I was clearly implying here that you were making a false assumption.

You said:

don't react to crass, baseless assumptions

Still not relevant. How have I lied and how am I still assuming? You have yet to prove your case and have taken my advice about how you should respond out of context (I was trying to be helpful there).