This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]xandit 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If choice isn't involved in such experiences, sensual or internally artistic, it would mean that someone is frequently being psychologically attacked, that they feel the way they do due to their genetics compelling them to, even if they don't like it whatsoever.

an example of this is someone who is gay but because of their upbringing have born told those desires are wrong. they have no control and may even try conversion therapy, which would not be needed if desire was a choice.

[–]SexualityCritical[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I've addressed this prior. I wasn't saying someone felt psychologically attacked because of anti-gay ideology, but because they themselves, on their own, not born out of any social conditioning, but born out of ideology, don't like their attraction. They're not anti-gay, they're just not interested in such lust.

[–]xandit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

they're just not interested in such lust.

and you are saying they can just choose not to be gay, the way you made a choice not to be straight because of misogamy.

[–]SexualityCritical[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm saying it's, on average, more rational for women to be exclusively sexually interested in women, if they're interested in any sex at all, just as it's more healthy for men to be exclusively sexually interested in men.