you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]soundsituation 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, it is TRA are misusing words again and calling us bio-essentialists, while we are not.

Yes, and I don't know if they truly misunderstand our position or just find it politically advantageous to lump us in with conservatives, who actually are essentialists. I could believe either or both.

[–]ZveroboyAlina 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

In a lot of points gender ideology is similar to beliefs of your typical conservatives, so it is again DARVO and saying that GC are doing what genderists did.

It is common strategy of them: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1HKWYDXEAUaJUV?format=jpg&name=medium

https://twitter.com/DiscordianKitty/status/1391313778483113984

They are describing all the bad that gender ideology is doing and saying "it is GC and TERFs".

Remember that "womXn" situation? When TRA were promoting "womxn" and "latinx" for 5+ years, while feminists were fighting against it. And then at one point they decided that "womxn" is transphobic, and then they backpedaled it, PinkNews, Mermaids and Stonewall started editing their old messages, where they used "womxn" and for public they said it is radfems who were pushing "womxn" to exclude transwomen from word "women".

Gaslighting and transgender movement are synonims.