you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]censorshipment 2 insightful - 10 fun2 insightful - 9 fun3 insightful - 10 fun -  (1 child)

Eh, I'd say the focus on reproductive rights and abortions was the most detrimental. It's all I've really heard about since the 80s (I was born in '83). Feminists should've been fighting to separate themselves from men in general. Husbands wouldn't have been wearing their wives' lingerie if women weren't marrying men in the first place. Why weren't most feminists also separatists? What was their problem with living among women only and building communities without men? Or simply being a lone wolf fighting to liberate women from all forms of relationships with men?

Why isn't this sub much bigger than it is? - https://www.reddit.com/r/wgtow/comments/mgln8d/why_isnt_this_sub_much_bigger_than_it_is/

Women aren’t stupid or being held back by some imaginary hand. They like being with men and would rather be with them than by themselves, despite the evidence that men are a waste of time and a bad investment. Women want to be housewives and serve men, that’s why most reject wgtow ideas. They don’t feel they have any value as a person without a husband. Doesn’t matter how miserable they are deep down, they need to show the world they can get a husband for validation. We need to be honest about women too.

[–]BiologyIsReal 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I really don't know how separatism is viable at long term unless you want to go either the extinction or transhumanist route. Plus, most people are heterosexual and want to have biological kids, so it's not surprising this is not a popular position to take.