you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]filbs111 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know that there isn't a double standard, but suspect it has to do with the exact words that are used to express ideas. Many creators, especially the surviving popular channels that address "controversial" issues, avoid certain words and phrases, even when referring to something someone else said that they disagree with, because "the algorithm" is a bit stupid sometimes, and because malicious people take things out of context. It's especially important to be careful about what you say about specific other individuals.

While I would prefer a world in which one can call a spade a spade, putting up videos saying that a specifc identifiable person is a man, is sailing very close to the wind in youtube land.

[–]slushpilot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It must be. I've seen enough videos from prominent YouTubers that have to use silly language workarounds like "who shall not be named" or a bleep with a wink and a nudge. They must believe they have actual concerns about losing their channel or losing prominence if the algorithm picks up some words even out of context.

It's maddening.