Vanessa Vokey's channel was just removed from YouTube

submitted by usehername from self.GenderCritical

Yet all the male GC YouTubers I'm subscribed to are A-okay.

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]SnowAssMan 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Must be false reporting. There is no way she overstepped the mark when Magdalen Berns' channel was never removed.

That having been said at least 3 of her videos have been removed prior to her channel being removed (the latest stream one, the pronouns one & a Sam Lux exited highlights), & these vids remained removed, so perhaps her channel got 3 strikes.

[–]usehername[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah I think its probably false reporting too. True about Mags but YT wasn't as woke back then. I might be tripping but do you think the fact that Vanessa was more feminine contributed?

[–]SnowAssMan 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Her twitter disappeared the same day, which seems weirdly coincidental.

I'm pretty sure this is her new channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYuTpLd9zFj1EGY3jDAq-A

I gave her an encouraging subscription

[–]FlippyKing 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (3 children)

GC people have to start supporting alternatives to Youtube and twitter, and ignore the scar-mongering about "those places are full on nazis" even if they are, so what? Nazis to the left of me, wealthy woke Maoist-Leninist-perverts to the right, here I am stuck in Saidit with you.

[–]WhiteZealot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The same ruling elite who are telling us what to think of "TERFs" have also been telling us what to think of Hitler and the NSDAP since WWII. Watch this: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qTT7SYbkTqNo/

[–]SnowAssMan 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We should probably download those videos & re-upload them to Youtube (mirror).

[–]Kai_Decadence 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think part of the problem is that many GC people are afraid that if they post on these other sites, it might not get seen because these platforms don't have the wide audience that YouTube has. That being said, you're right that if YouTube is gonna keep suppressing anyone who dare criticize this faulty ideology of "transgender" then we'll need to upload to these sites.

[–]Kai_Decadence 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just noticed this right now when I was checking back to see if she made any new videos and couldn't find her channel. I thought it might be a YouTube glitch but no, it looks like her channel has been removed or hidden. Are they fucking serious?? I'm more than sure SnowAssMan is right that perhaps what happened is she received 3 strikes on her channel and I believe if that happens, it means your channel will be removed. And knowing just how much of an impact her channel was making with all the hard hitting truths, she most likely got ganged up on even more TRAs and handmaidens. Either way I hope that she comes back, it's completely unfair for her to lose her channel when she didn't do anything wrong. Criticizing an ideology is not hate speech and she never even used derogatory language neither. I'm just lost for words.

[–]kwallio 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And other channels spewing racism and misogyny are still up.

[–]Destruction 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What the fuck??? This is straight up censorship!

[–]ElectricSheep 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that surprising

[–]filbs111 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know that there isn't a double standard, but suspect it has to do with the exact words that are used to express ideas. Many creators, especially the surviving popular channels that address "controversial" issues, avoid certain words and phrases, even when referring to something someone else said that they disagree with, because "the algorithm" is a bit stupid sometimes, and because malicious people take things out of context. It's especially important to be careful about what you say about specific other individuals.

While I would prefer a world in which one can call a spade a spade, putting up videos saying that a specifc identifiable person is a man, is sailing very close to the wind in youtube land.

[–]slushpilot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It must be. I've seen enough videos from prominent YouTubers that have to use silly language workarounds like "who shall not be named" or a bleep with a wink and a nudge. They must believe they have actual concerns about losing their channel or losing prominence if the algorithm picks up some words even out of context.

It's maddening.

[–]Pocketmesser 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oof, I subscribed to her just a week ago. Damn.