Does Reddit stand by its decision to remove feminist and lesbian subreddits like R/GenderCritical, which contained some 65,000 members, at the request of someone who, at the very least, has covered up for a paedophile?

submitted by dreamgerms from grahamlinehan.substack.com

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]censorshipment 14 insightful - 6 fun14 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

In 2019 Aimee’s future husband Nathaniel Dean Knight of Michigan was outed by Mumsnet for writing sex stories involving children.

Nathaniel wrote the tweets below to defend himself but received a backlash from Twitter users. These tweets led to Aimee being investigated and removed from the UK’s Liberal Democrats and eventually she was removed from Stonewall’s trans advisory board. Nathaniel also had his Twitter account suspended.

Smfh wow, thanks for sharing this. Didn't know.

[–]BEB 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do they have to use "her" for this turd because this substack is out of the UK and they have to use preferred pronouns?

[–]germinare 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup. That’s our future and it’s coming quick.

[–]usehername 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Graham Linehan has done another, more in-depth article on this guy. Worth a read, if you can stomach it:

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/ashton-challenor-the-boy-who-disappeared

[–]dreamgerms[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I read that article after I posted this one, and the urge to pour bleach in my eyes was overwhelming.

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fucking tell me about it

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I believe Reddit does, yes.

Post Epstein, I went down a rabbit hole of looking at pedos in power. There's a conspiracy theory that Ghislane Maxwell was involved with the founding of reddit, and is a prominent reddit user who controlled subreddits politics, science, technology, and worldnews. Of course, this conspiracy theory is exactly that, a theory - but it is not a conspiracy that this powerful account was promoting pedophilia:

The topics the account does often wade into include — but are not limited to — the ages of sexual consent in various regions, the supposed overreach of sex offender laws, pedophilia, graphic violence against children, "over-zealous" child protection legislation, child psychology, and advocating for the legalization of child porn.

This sums up the conspiracy for me:

The thing that should probably concern you, and Reddit itself, is not whether or not Ghislaine Maxwell was among the creeps who basically run Reddit, one of the world's most influential news sources, but that there are creeps like u/ MaxwellHill in charge of such a large chunk of the internet's discourse… Should Reddit step in and intervene if a person who advocates for the legalization of child porn and revels in descriptions of violence against children has a sizable impact on their product?

In my opinion, Reddit would not be "stepping in," as it is part of the problem with Reddit itself. Besides the issue of u/ MaxwellHill and the new support of AC, Ellen Pao, Ex-Reddit CEO, claimed many elite knew Maxwell was supplying underage girls - Pao herself knew this and did nothing for 9 years.

My conclusion: After researching Epstein, Dan Schneider at Nickelodeon, Jimmy Saville and Dutroux, among others, I'm convinced that raping or supporting the rape of children is a requirement for entering the elite class. Doing something so awful to a child proves you have no soul or morals, and as a bonus gives blackmail to the elite. Meanwhile, a child who is raped who supports their rapists and the system is rewarded with fame or entering the elite as well. Reddit has some part in this. While they would probably drop AC if pressured enough, I believe they knew AC is at least involved with pedophiles. If there is not enough pressure, I expect to see some drivel and maybe some meaningless punishment.

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is kinda sounding tinfoil hat but also probable. I'll look into it.

[–]usehername 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay I just read it, and that's fucking disturbing.

[–]GConly 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Does anyone else wonder what's on his hard drive?

[–]dreamgerms[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, but I’m sure the FBI would.

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, I don' t want to have nightmares for the rest of my life.

[–]Liz-B-Anne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reddit is full to the brim with pedo apologists. I run into them on multiple subs just out in the open all the time. I guess the demographic of 20-something white males is rife with them. Won't be surprised when they do stand by the decision. The only time they DON'T do something or ban something is when there's media pressure it seems. (Like the /r/jailbait situation).