An employee at a Women's Prison in Washington alleges that a woman was immediately raped upon the transfer of a male sexual predator, who identifies as transgender. The employee also alleges that women are terrified as 150 other men are in line to be transferred.

submitted by BEB from (mynorthwest.com)

all 37 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]censorshipment 21 insightful - 6 fun21 insightful - 5 fun22 insightful - 6 fun -  (12 children)

“He is a proven sexual predator, having committed multiple crimes against women, yet the State of Washington had no problem moving him into a women’s facility and housing him with the most vulnerable in our population (our mental health unit),” the employee wrote.

A blue state... of course. Where are women the safest? In segregated places! Without any men, including no male employees.

[–]WhiteZealot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Women are safest when protected by their husband and male relatives.

[–]Juniperius 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yeah no. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/violence-against-women-femicide-census/

[–]akkordeonplayer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don’t trust WEF, but I agree that male relatives are extremely dangerous in their own right. Remember Jozef Fritzl, anyone?

[–]WhiteZealot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The latest UN figures show that 137 women across the world are killed every day by a partner or member of their own family – a total of 50,000 women a year murdered by people they know and should be able to trust.

That means it's happening to about 0.0013% of the world's female population every year. That's exceedingly rare.

Also, the rate of this type of violence differs between the races. It's rarest among Whites and East Asians.

[–]usehername 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Women are more likely to be killed by a family member or domestic partner than anyone else.

[–]WhiteZealot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's because they're around family members and domestic partners far more than they are around anyone else. What you're not taking into account is all of the violence that would befall women if husbands and male family members weren't there protecting them, which far outweighs the violence that said husbands/family members are perpetrating.

Whether it's fathers or husbands or police or soldiers, at the end of the day, only men can protect women from men. The most trustworthy men for the job, and the most effective (due to quick response time to threats), are husbands and male family members.

[–]usehername 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's hilarious. Only men can protect women from men? Men are the threat. Also this:

The most trustworthy men for the job, and the most effective (due to quick response time to threats), are husbands and male family members.

is a blatant lie.

[–]WhiteZealot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Certain men are a threat and certain other men are the protectors from that threat.

[–]usehername 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't be disingenuous. The threat is almost 100% male. You're a fool, and clearly a man. Male relatives and partners are more of a threat than random males, they are by no means "protectors" of women.

[–]dreamgerms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah the police really love protecting women, with that 40%+ domestic violence rate and the abysmally low prosecution rate of rapists. Stranger danger is a lie. The vast majority of men who do harm to women are their spouses and acquaintances, and there are endless studies and statistics that bear this out. Men commit 80% of violent crime. They are NOT our protectors and they are NOT defending us.

[–]Juniperius 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The point is that it's mostly romantic partners or family members that are killing women.

[–]censorshipment 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Majority (as in at least 51%) of women/girls are harmed by their male relatives...

[–]cinnaflo 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

This is so fucking evil holy shit. I feel so sorry for these women... fuck Democrats, the more I learn about this, the more they seem to represent those evil caricature-like monsters in horror films.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

This is why people loved Trump so much. Like yes, of course he is an utter piece of shit - but to Democrats.

[–]jet199 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Trumps intelligence was his strength.

There was no way he was ever going to be able to jump through the intellectual hoops needed to justify men in women's prisons so the woke had no way to get to him.

Just like his work ethic meant he was never going to be authoritarian.

[–]GConly 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Gee, who could have predicted this.

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Right? Men, some of them rapists and violent, in women' s prison... what could possibly go wrong?

[–]BEB[S] 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

California, Washington state and Canada - "tolerant" "Progressive" places passing laws that in effect legalize the rape and sexual assault of trapped women.

F-ing shameful.

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Add Illinois - home base of the Pritzkers, Obamas & many others in the Democratic Party power elite, where one of the Pritzkers is currently governor - to the list, BEB. The first prisoner in Illinois who was moved from a male prison to a female one raped a female inmate the very first day he was put in with the general population of women. In male prison, he had murdered one of his male cellmates by strangling him to death with his bare hands. Once he was transferred to female prison and put in segregation so the staff could get a sense of him, the first thing he did was to stop taking the estrogen tablets he'd been taking in male prison since he'd started claiming to be trans. Also, the prison warden of the women's prison later testified that this male prisoner was sexually inappropriate with male & female members of staff, & generally constantly pushing boundaries & making/asking for trouble.

The rapist's attorneys - pro bono from the prestigious MacArthur Justice Center in Chicago - responded to the lawsuit filed against Illinois correctional authorities by the woman who was raped, and to complaints made by other women who've also alleged the same guy sexually assaulted them in the prison, by saying the women's charges just show that "transphobia is everywhere."

BTW, Connecticut was the first state in the US to pass a law saying convicts are to be placed in prisons based on their gender identity, not their sex.

https://www.newsweek.com/connecticut-transgender-prisoners-first-us-win-right-be-housed-according-947312

https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-ap-trans-inmates-connecticut-law-20180526-story.html

https://nypost.com/2019/10/29/notorious-connecticut-killer-undergoes-gender-transition-in-prison/

Connecticut, of course, is also the state where the governing body for scholastic sports says males must be allowed to compete in female sports solely based on their self-ID as girls/women - no T suppression, puberty blockers, estrogen treatment, surgeries or any body modification required.

Not coincidentally, Biden's Secretary of Education got that post after serving as the Connecticut Commissioner of Education. Now he will oversee the Biden admin's plans to turn Title IX on its head to insure that males can use "gender identity" claims to compete in girls & women's sports.

[–]BEB[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the information, although it fills me with pure rage at what these women are going through.

[–]ElectricSheep 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a man myself, I have to say that the most misogynistic and violent men sure do love to cosplay as women to hide behind the thin veil of woke progressivism.

[–]MarkTwainiac 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

BTW, this story didn't make the PBS News Hour or any other MSM news I watched today or tonight. But it did get mentioned on Tucker Carlson's show on FOX Tuesday night. Also, Carlson had rad feminist Kara Dansky of the WHRC on again Tuesday to talk about the misnomered Equality Act. Dansky brought up not only that men are committing these crimes against women, but now such crimes are being recorded and reported by local, state and federal authorities, including the FBI, as having been committed by women.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I found out who Julia Beck is after Tucker interviewed her a few years ago, and I'm right here in Baltimore.

People fling all kinds of mud his way, "forgetting" that he was the moderate gold standard on both pre-insanity CNN and MSNBC not too long ago. He simply reports on the crap that the...sigh, 'fake news' simply will not - particularly when it comes to China and trans activism.

[–]BEB[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I had to listen to Fox News 24/7 while visiting elderly relatives. IMO Tucker can be sane (and often was before he hit FOX) but he spews a lot of crap too. That being said, I am extremely glad Carlson is giving feminists a voice on this issue.

Julia Beck's speech against the Equality Act's during the 2019 House Judiciary Committee hearings was one for the ages - shero!

I think this is it, if not use keywords "Julia Beck" "Equality Act" "House Judiciary"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-PTSA51azU

[–]BEB[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kara Dansky will deservedly go down in herstory. Go, Kara!

[–]Baileyscheesecakes 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fact that stories like this go unreported in many news outlets is unconscionable and even more egregious is the line that the women are being transphobic.

How do TRAs explain the rapists who suddenly declare themselves women? If, according to their claims, transgender people have always been transgender, then these felons disprove the assertion that transgender people are no threat to women. If they say that these men aren't really transgender, then they commit the heinous crime of doubting someone's identity and have to concede that some men will take advantage of self-id to harm women, which has been our point all along. Maybe one reason these stories are buried is that they demonstrate the gaping holes in TRA logic (an oxymoron)

[–]hfxB0oyA 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

...So what you're saying is that this is an entire prison full of bigots.

/s, in case that wasn't obvious.

[–]Nosce_te_ipsum 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It always bothered me that the sports issue is what most people concentrate on when talking about TIMs in female spaces. While it's justified for people to be outraged about that, I would have thought putting convicted male sex offenders in prisons with women would've enraged the masses more. And maybe people think those women are criminals and deserve no sympathy, but what about allowing men access to women's domestic abuse shelters and rape crisis centers?

The truth is that the women who end up in prisons and shelters are some of the most vulnerable in our society, and have no voice. Everybody has failed them, especially (mainstream, liberal) "feminism". I wonder if we'll ever look back on this with horror and vow to never allow it to happen again, or if things will just continue to worsen, with no hope or justice in sight.

[–]MarkTwainiac 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are photos and video footage of TIM athletes trouncing women online for all the world to see. There are also many prominent people & organizations (such as the ACLU, the IOC, the MSM) who take the position that TIMs being able to compete in female sports is "the civil rights issue of our time." Odious, misogynistic TRA athletes like Cece Telfer and Ragehell McKinnon/Veronica Ivy give interviews with the press and make posts on social media that reveal how entitled & male supremacist they are...

Whereas what's happening in prisons is all happening out of sight - with no footage, photos or social media posts. And in today's world, if there's not a clip of an event, then the event didn't happen.

Plus, women in prison aren't just "some of the most vulnerable in our society" as you say, they are also a group hardly any other group seems to care about. Those who argue for abolition of police & prisons and point out the ill of "the incarceral state" are entirely focused on males.

Look what's happened with the Prison Rape Elimination Act in the USA. In implementing the PREA, all the focus has been on males being raped mostly by other male inmates in male prisons, & to some extent by guards/staff as well. By contrast, very little attention has been paid to female prisoners being raped or sexually assaulted in female prisons either by staff or by other female prisoners.

In fact the PREA is now used as a/the major justification for why TIMs should be transferred to female prisons. The "rationale" is that male rapes of other males is the most important thing to be reduced - as long as that objective is achieved, or aimed at, who cares if by moving male convicts into female prisons, female prisoners end up getting raped by male prisoners? So long as the male prisoners are better off is all that matters.

[–]BEB[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's barbaric.

[–]spinningIntelligence 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

..... How? How did any of this sound like a good idea?

[–]one1won 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This has been a male fantasy fetish for (ever?!).

Caged women trope was very popular in movies:

https://m.imdb.com/list/ls066427139/

[–]SharpTomorrow 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"it never happens"

"it's just a minor issue"

I've heard these sentences from women claiming to be feminist themselves, I wish I was kidding.

[–]BEB[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ask them why a man who exposes himself on the street is jailed, but a man who calls himself a woman and exposes himself to their daughter in her locker room is "stunning & brave."

[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

BEB, I get your point about the double standard and agree with it completely, but in US jurisdictions a man who exposes himself on the street is not jailed necessarily or automatically. With a few exceptions, indecent exposure in public is against the law in nearly every jurisdiction in the US, but the bar to get a man arrested, prosecuted, convicted & sentenced to jail for IE is pretty high.

[–]BEB[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Too bad these pervs. don't get nailed.

We should have a thread in which we talk about the first time a man exposed himself to us. Mine was a man in a parked car when I was walking down the sidewalk. I was 16.