all 11 comments

[–]Doberlady 15 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

It's not good enough to be inclusive. They have to be the center of attention! I guess they are drag queens after all.

[–]MarkTwainiac 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That one post encapsulates what this whole movement is about: men who call women "cxnts" & "trash" colonizing & "centering" themselves in women's movements, spaces & sports. Cross-dressing conquistadors claim they "are the new face of feminism" and feminism is symbolized by red lipstick.

[–]linda_senora 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These men are revolting.

[–]GConly 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If feminism doesn't centremen, we can't have it.

[–]absoluteblasphemy 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I really have to wonder if these guys think talking like this is “helping their cause” and then I remember how many women are handmaidening “yasss guurl” over disgusting comments like this.

I just despair, I need coffee and a cigarette lmao.

[–]linda_senora 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well said!

Women who praise these sadistic men are even worse.

AOC and women like her are much more dangerous.

[–]BEB 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Then there are the older, female, "Progressive" politicians, who really should know better, gleefully throwing women under the bus.

In the US: Kamala Harris, Senator Tammy Baldwin, Senator Liz Warren and, yes, AOC.

[–]absoluteblasphemy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, I have to wonder if it’s purely political for these older women, political corruption as well as in-group out-group thinking don’t discriminate. By which I mean women have been known to sell each other out, intentionally or otherwise.

Very grateful to have Baroness Nicholson in the U.K. to stand as an older female voice on the issue, as well as prominent progressives like JK Rowling who have influence. We’re now seeing a lot more men speak up here, and Keira Bell’s case was heard in the US senate too. That gives me hope the dialogue may change, it does seem to be a problem that doesn’t translate well into US politics.

[–]BEB 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

US politics currently have little to no nuance.

If you're a Democrat, you often automatically sign up for what the Democratic platform is, even if it's insane like the gender agenda, and automatically hate what the Republicans do, again, even if it's sane, like pushing back against the gender agenda.

Same with the Republicans - universal health care should be a no-brainer, but they reject it, even if some of them found themselves dependent on Obamacare, which they didn't know was Obamacare because they're idiots.

So right now, the Republicans are making sense on the gender issue. Everyone who isn't a Democrat can see the GOP is making sense. This might sway independents and women enough for the Democrats to lose in 2022, because every day the Democrats seem ever more batshit crazy pushing the Gender Agenda.

Tammy Baldwin is a blatant opportunist, as is Kamala Harris IMO.

Not sure what Liz Warren's trip is - maybe she's grandma trying to be hip for the kids? Or she's a true believer like other old style feminists who think that trans"women" smash the patriarchy?

AOC is just vile. She knows what she's doing to confused kids - she jumped in to support MERMAIDS - a UK child transitioning organization - and just doesn't care.

[–]SharpTomorrow 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is this a "satire" account or what? Hard to believe someone would genuinely think that men should be the center of feminism. There is already a movement for that it's called MRA.

This is why I've always rejected intersectionality, it doesn't matter how well meant it was, it quickly became the trojan horse from TRA, islamists, pimps, their backdoor into "feminism". Feminists should have rejected that. In no time they were already fighting among themselves, "white feminism" vs "black feminism", "rich feminism" vs "working class feminism", divide and conquer, this is the result of all that... "Make way for the 'new women'"? No.