all 8 comments

[–]BiologyIsReal 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is brilliant!

And it's quite telling that the twitter user of the "uterus holding individual" had no problem saying the word "men".

[–]adungitit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I guess "penis holding individuals" just has a different tone to it.

[–]aloris342 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The slicing apart of the plain, universal understanding of the word "women" into individualized bodily functions (menstruator, chestfeeder, vulva haver, birthing person) is precisely targeted at preventing us from engaging in political or social advocacy for our common interests. Not only does it (by separating us into disparate groups by biological minutiae) prevent us advocating for our common interests in the future, it also strips away the fruits of political advocacy that women have already achieved, hence nullifying legitimate political activity. It is a method of political disenfranchisement. That so many women fail to see this is strange to me. Why bother electing or petitioning to our elected representatives at all, when any law they write can simply be nullified in the future by redefining the basic meanings of words? The consequences of the legal erasure of women (by allowing males to define themselves into the legal category of women at will) go far beyond merely the consequences to ourselves. This is significant for our entire system of representation.

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks!

To Americans: In that vein, I'm worried about the US Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), but haven't researched what's happening with it yet. If the Equality Act passes, what happens to the intent (sorry, I don't know what the legal term is) of the ERA?

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a funny and informative article - thanks for posting!

[–]SillyMoneyGoose 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the ‘chestfeeding’ drawing the only woman that clearly still identifies as one has the ‘discreet chestfeeding’ position

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Trans-Exterminating Reactionary Fascism

has worked fine for me

[–]Rationalmind 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Substack is a godsend for free thinking.