you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BEB[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sure we expand what a woman is, but then where does it end?

I read an essay by a civil rights lawyer who brought up the great point that if we change the law to legitimize the nebulous idea of "gender identity" what will be the next group demanding the same kind of change?

When Furries gain the upper hand will we be forced to distinguish normies by saying "People without fur"?

This has nothing to do with actual people with gender dysphoria and everything to do with profit for pharmaceutical/medical, as well as super-wealthy autogynephilic men changing the world so they don't seem like freaks, as well as something more sinister - trans-humanism? Sterilizing kids to keep the global population down?

Whatever is driving this, I'm scared of it. We all should be.

[–]Rationalmind 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No other civil rights movement needs invasive medical intervention. That should be a tip off that trans is bullshit.

[–]BEB[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That is such a great talking point!

But you know that most TiMs (close to 90%) don't get their balls whacked off? That's according to the National Center for Transgender Equality itself. So men who claim to be women aren't actually doing invasive medical interventions; they're just pretending so that the less-informed will call us bigots when we say we don't want them in our locker rooms.

[–]Rationalmind 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you! Yes, I did know that most of the TiM’s don’t get sex reassignment surgery. I figured it still applies if someone has to take hormones to claim civil rights.