you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkTwainiac 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

I think in Ovarit-speak "circle" is code for "clique." And that an unwritten rule of most of the cliques is that no one can disagree or question the approved views that the members of the clique seem to have all taken an oath to agree with and defend to the death.

I've only made a few comments there, all in response to posts I came across on the main page - under the headings "New," "Top" or "Hot" - that I found factually inaccurate, historically uninformed, authoritarian and/or in which it seemed to me that a poster with one set of rather limited life experiences and views was appropriating/using other people's very different life experiences in ways that struck me as unfair, unseemly and/or disrespectful. Pretty much all my posts immediately got me flamed, blocked and told that I'm mean and horrible, and that I have some nerve to say what I did.

Only later did I realize that the posts I'd responded to were from "circles" aka cliques where groupthink prevails and other views are anathema. If Ovarit is gonna continue calling its subs "circles," I think it might be best to label a lot of them "closed circles." (Another term with the word "circle" in it comes to mind, too, but it's too crude and male for me to mention, LOL.)

The whole place seem puerile, petty and fully of people saying "you should," "we must" and "you can't say or think that."

Now that I've started paying attention to the "circles" in which comments/threads are posted - rather than just to the title, topic and content of the posts as I did previously - I'm also of the opinion that there are too many different "circles" that seem to overlap or cover the same topics, and there's no way any outsiders or newcomers could possibly discern or have a what the differences amongst/between them might be.

Of course I get the difference between, say, Gender Critical and STEM and Games and ArtsandYarns. But not between GenderCritical, TransLogic, TerfisaSlur and ItsaFetish; or between Women'sLiberation, RadFemmery and NameTheProblem. And what on earth is Women supposed to be about? Even when I click on these cliques - oops circles - and read their descriptions, I still don't often see the difference between them.

I'll continue to look at the home page and read Ovarit on occasion, but probably won't try to contribute further. It's not a place for the likes of me.

[–]akkordeonplayer[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're probably right-- cliques would be a better term for them to use. To me, it would make better sense for them to use "flares" instead of "circles", and to avoid nuking threads unless they were obvious duplicates and/or outright offensive and against the site's general focus. More posts and threads = more engagement = more clicks. Why be so particular about who posts to what "circle" if most people probably view "all" when it comes to their feeds?

LOL. I actually posted my criticism to the "circles" circle, then realized AFTER the fact that there was a "suggestions" circle. I made a snark comment about "watch this thread get nuked because I didn't post it to "suggestions". THEN one of them scolds me for not putting it in "suggestions", asking me "so why didn't you use suggestions?" which I didn't know existed in the first place! Someone else tells me they will generously leave my comment up despite being in the "wrong circle"!

What the hell?

A year ago I would have been far more tolerant, but I'm just not having it anymore. If I smell a rat on a social media platform, or too much censorship for no justifiable reason, I jump ship. Nuked my Reddit account, nuked my Twitter account, now nuked my Ovarit account. I'd rather stick to Saidit for this particular topic.

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

OMG, LOL, I can't believe they have a circle to comment about "circles" and a separate "suggestions" circle. I've looked at the circle directory and still can't fathom some of the differences between the circles. But the underlying message is very off-putting and anxiety-provoking.

[–]akkordeonplayer[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's like, why bother posting any new threads at all? Perhaps they don't WANT people starting new threads?