Teen Vogue promotes rape porn to teen girls and says women can enjoy it and that it is "feminist" thing to do. What an actual fk?

submitted by ColoredTwice from (twitter.com)

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]our_team_is_winning 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Did that seriously say porn can be great if it's "ethically sourced" ???? Like the hipster equivalent of "locally made eco-friendly artisanal" yada yada? But it's not craft beer or homegrown vegetables. It's women having every orifice abused for other men to beat off to.

Teen Vogue should just be called "Teen Grooming."

When teen mags went from "how to tell if a boy likes you" to "how to take it up the ass," that's when pervo men knew they had won.

[–]ColoredTwice[S] 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

That is not just "ethical porn", but "ethical non-consensual porn" - so it either filmed without women's consent, or it is filmed rape. And they are promoting this as something good and something that teen girl would enjoy watching or experiencing. It is just grooming.

I would not be surprised if article is written by same transwoman who wrote "anal sex for teen girls" article in Vogue few years ago, and who forgot (or never knew in the first place) that clitoris exist at all.

[–]yousaythosethings 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A trans woman wrote that? What’s their name?

[–]Femaleisnthateful 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It appears to be written by @Nona, or Nona Aronowitz. She appears to be female, and of the very Woke variety ie. "police exist to make White liberals feel safe".

I notice that the subject line of the article is very different from the content. The subject is all 'its ok to ~want~ to watch porn', which is an easy thing for whomever is buying this for their teen to get behind. The actual content is much more.... aggressive.

[–]Nosce_te_ipsum 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"Porn that portrays nonconsensual sex, for instance, isn't necessarily misogynist if it centers all characters' pleasure and agency".

I've heard my fair share of arguments for why rape porn isn't bad, but I think this one takes the cake. I'm not even sure you can call this mental gymnastics. I would like the author of this piece to look up the definitions for "nonconsensual", "pleasure" and "agency" and then re-read what they wrote. But I guess this is what happens if words cease to have an established meaning. You can write this type of nonsense, and have it make sense in you head, somehow.

I don't say this very often, but this is, absolutely, grooming. And then we wonder why teenage girls have started identifying in droves as non-binary asexuals.

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think its also in part to all the hormones in much of our water. It is getting our young people way out of whack biologically.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

WTF is up with Teen Vogue? I remember when it was just fashion, makeup and cheesy dating advise. Now it's anal sex and hardcore rape porn.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's run by men aiming at a readership of mostly fetishists and groomers.

[–]ColoredTwice[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://twitter.com/WomenReadWomen/status/1353863417778429953

A lot of links in this thread.

[–]ColoredTwice[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And found this too in comments: https://twitter.com/Wecantconsentto/status/1260867906491101184

[–]akkordeonplayer 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's this article circulating that says once famous newspapers like The Rolling Stone are allowing people to pay THEM to publish their own articles-- Instead of having journalists write content, they're allowing rich people to give them money to publish content... because so many magazines/media outlets are losing tons of money. I'm starting to wonder how many media outlets are literally getting bought out by weirdos who want to publish pro-gender-extremism, pro-pedophilia and pro-kink articles.

[–]ColoredTwice[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

loosing money

I wonder why? Maybe because "women's journals" are focusing male problems and goung woke, instead of focusing their targeted audience? Naaaaaah, can't be that.