I'm not intentionally being provocative, goady or argumentative here. I just don't get why this IMGUR image of text from PP (shown without any context) is supposed to be more offensive to females than to males.

The male anatomy is described in a way that is completely incorrect. Coz the internal parts of male sex anatomy are NOT typically made up of testicles as the text says. The internal parts of male sex anatomy are made up of the prostate, vas deferens and other organs. The testicles in nearly 100% of males are external.

The internal parts of female sexual anatomy include the vagina and other organs such as the uterus, Fallopian tubes and ovaries.

However, due to disease, medical conditions or other reasons (such as adopting an opposite-sex "gender identity"), many grown women have the parts of their internal female sex anatomy other than their vaginas - the ovaries, Fallopian tubes and uterus - surgically removed. Moreover, some women coz of DSDs/VSCs never developed some/all of the internal female sex organs in the first place.

Therefore I can see the point of PP using the phrasing "what's typically referred to as female" in this one particular instance. Though I can't know for sure coz, again, the full context has been omitted.