you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]levoyageur718293 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A funny bit of rhetorical jiu-jitsu just occurred to me. You could indeed have women only spaces under intersectional calculus, but you'd have to name it backwards - you'd start by making it a space for the female sex, regardless of gender identity, but then assert that since the class of men marginalizes the class of women, no men (trans men, aka tifs) are allowed in it. The result would be the same, but because of how you've sliced it, it should satisfy woke policing.

I mean, it wouldn't, of course, because tims want everything, but they would have no rhetorical grounds to oppose.