all 5 comments

[–]turtleduck23 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they say women are not being erased and then turn around and give four positions meant for women to men. but we're not being replaced...ok

[–]NemoRina 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And how many TiFs they have? None? So surprising!

[–]diapason 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So 75% men? Interesting how they like to claim women won't suffer less representation, and then they go and do shit like this (Also, if it's an LGBT committee, shouldn't there be more representation of the LGB relative to the T? I wonder how many lesbians are on the committee too, cause I'm gonna bet lesbian representation on that committee is appallingly low if only a quarter of the members are women)

[–]Jksmiddlefinger 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The reply says it all, Misogyny is woke.

[–]our_team_is_winning 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Labour needs an LGB Committee. Drop the T. An LGB committee would not be threatening a GC woman. They would be, ideally, making sure same-sex attraction was not used against anyone. A "T" committee immediately starts trying to take things away from women.