you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WrongToy 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

i used to say that without a definition of woman, there can be no women's rights.

Party A is OK with the definition, they're just not ok with the rights. Party B thinks the rights are ok but the definition is not.

[–]Spicylikegumbo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

States have had more influence over these issues. For example, I left a red state that did not allow single women to have IVF. Basically I had no chance of being a mother in that state. I moved to a blue state and even though I have more reproductive rights, the gender identity stuff will gradually complicate life for me as a woman.

So I guess I will move back to a red state once I achieve motherhood or no longer care about it.

[–]WrongToy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whoa, there's actually any state that disallows women from having ivf?