you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]missdaisycan 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's a lie. A lie. It's just another thing to toss out there to evoke sympathy for themselves in their self-declared oppression olympics. If TW were truly concerned with their safety, third facilities should be acceptable, right?

[–]Daraincork 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes it is . In one of my jobs ( roadsweeper) I had no option but to use a public convenience which was a well known cottage. Considering it was in a pretty rough part of London you might have expected a bit of friction , no pun intended. But nobody paid any heed to lads in make up etc. The trans lack of enthusiasm for separate facilties for themselves or even unisex is a bit revealing isn't it?

[–]MarkTwainiac 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Clarification for those not familiar with UK-specific parlance: in British English "cottage" is a verb that means to partake in (male) homosexual acts in a public toilet facility, aka a loo or what in the US/NA is called a bathroom.