New "I love JK Rowling" billboard goes up in San Francisco

submitted by TangerineRabbit from self.GenderCritical

Let's see how long this one lasts

photo

all 32 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]aldoushuxleyghost 26 insightful - 3 fun26 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This is great news. While it's no billboard, I got a ton of stickers to do the same locally. So can you from Posie Parkers shop... www.standingforwomen.com/shop

[–]BEB 25 insightful - 3 fun25 insightful - 2 fun26 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

It's so great that it's in San Francisco too, because this whole area is driving the global Trans Train and has been for years. Judith Butler, the foundress of all this Queer Theory rot, teaches at Berkeley.

Silicon Valley is heavily invested in Trans, Inc., so the "Progressive" Democratic congresspeople in the area are all 1 billion percent behind destroying women's rights in favor of trans demands.

[–]denverkris 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Silicon Valley is heavily invested in Trans

Sure they are, easiest way for them to fix the gender discrepancy in tech.

[–]BEB 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, probably a higher % of men on the autism spectrum and incels.

[–]Skipdip 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Love it! Go SF!

[–]BEB 21 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The man who put up this and the Vancouver billboard, Chris Elson (?) along with a very brave Canadian GC feminist named Amy Hamm, credited a secret Silicon Valley investor.

I hope this secret investor also throws some money to WoLF (Women's Liberation Front), FIST (Feminists In Struggle), the Women's Human Rights Campaign, and other rad fem and GC groups!

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

First Amendment should protect this. Even MAGA is more inflammatory than this.

[–]Daraincork 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Great stuff. Let's hope we see more like this 💚

[–]WrongToy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Should have done it in San Mateo, which is where wokesters go when they get old enough to have kids...most of them that is

[–]buttbuttinator 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Going to SF this week. What's the location?

[–]BEB 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

I hope that they put it up in the aptly-named Scott Wiener's SF district. No, I hope they put it right outside Scott Wiener's kitchen window.

Scott Wiener is the California state senator behind almost all of the inexplicably passed and pending California gender ideology bills, like the bill with a $1000/year in jail fine for "misgendering."

The bill that allows men to self-identify and be house with women in nursing homes and longterm disability care.

The making sex safe for gay pedophiles bill (Wiener claimed it was to even out the penalty for gay and straight people who have sex with minors) and our own favorites, the taxpayer paying for transition bill and the men in women's prisons bill.

I want Scott Wiener to have to see that billboard every time he looks out the window.

[–]luckystar 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I was talking about this w/my spouse the other day. Scott Wiener seems to make promoting creepy ass bills his #1 priority. And when questioned, he accuses detractors of being homophobic, transphobic, or alt-right conspiracy theorists. But each bill he introduces is using LGBT as a shield for something really perverse that has nothing to do with human rights.

It's one thing to go with the flow because you're a Democrat elected official and the winds are blowing "trans women are women". I doubt that Kamala Harris, for instance, considered the ins and outs of gender identity politics before putting "she/her" in her Twitter bio.

But to make it the main goal of your legislative career? Focusing on making sure HIV can be spread, making sure males are put in female prisons and other female spaces, making sure that gay pedos have the same "right" to be let off the hook easy that straight pedos can... it's way too much to be a coincidence.

I honestly would not be surprised whatsoever if it later came out that Wiener is having full blown child rape parties, Epstein-style. He just strikes me as a very sick man.

[–]BEB 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Scott Wiener is apparently getting $$ to push the transgenda.

A California housing organization hired an investigative reporter to look into Wiener. I posted the results of the investigation here, but if I can find them I will post them again.

Wiener receives money from Gilead Sciences, makers of Remedesvir (sp?) the COVID drug, but also the makers of Truvada, the HIV prophylactic. So Wiener gets a bill passed that downgrades knowingly transmitting HIV to a misdemeanor.

Gilead also is the main sponsor of the transgender march on Washington DC.

Follow the money as usual.

But then there's Toni Atkins, Wiener's partner in atrocities. She's a lesbian. She's a fucking piece of work too and now is President Pro Temp of the California state Senate. She was previously the Speaker of the Assembly.

For whatever reason, Wiener and Atkins have a hold on the Democratic party in the CA state legislature. I would suggest that the party is receiving $$, but having talked to some of their staff, I think some of the dumbo politicians are actually true believers.

So CA Dems support of the transgenda is probably a combination of lobby $ and trying to be more Radical Left than anyone else on Earth, because California has a reputation to maintain for being the Land of Fruits & Nuts.

[–]luckystar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The money thing is interesting. I suspected it was either due to $$$ from pharma (incentive to keep pumping out HRT, HIV drugs) or due to personal perversions. Probably a combination of both. Wonder how many raped kids this sicko has in his closet.

About the last part though, tbh I'm a progressive in general, I definitely wouldn't be happy in Texas or another conservative state. But I don't see how any of this is "progressive". When I start seeing being opposed to child sex trafficking or being disgusted at the movie Cuties as a "right wing conspiracy theory" I'm just... lost. I know back in the 80s NAMBLA tried to hop on the bandwagon of gay rights by pretending pedophilia is just another kind of love too. I don't see how it's "progressive" to be "tolerant" of child abuse. Tolerance doesn't mean being so open minded your brain falls out.

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

If you are in California, I would suggest you call some of the state representatives and talk to their offices about this issue. You will soon see that for whatever completely misguided reason, some Democratic lawmakers in California have bought what Trans, Inc., is selling.

Some of them are probably doing it because of lobbying money -I suspect Ted Lieu might be one of those, both when he was in the CA state legislature and now in the US House, but I haven't checked Lieu's money trail.

Ted Lieu is a complete piece of shit, though - he's the one who's pushed the bills both in CA and in the US House banning "gender identity" conversion meaning parents and other concerned adults have a much harder time stopping a minor child from transitioning.

Other lawmakers, like this twerp in the Ventura area, "feminist" and lawyer, Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, are true believers that trans "rights" are the civil rights struggle of our time and if women have any fear about Bruno with a beard and an erection in their locker room they just need to "get over it." I heard that exact phrase twice from CA Democratic lawmakers offices.

I do think that the Republicans and Donald are the biggest threat the world faces (because Donald is so unstable and has his finger on the nuclear trigger) and because the GOP just doesn't seem to care, but I truly hate the Democrats in the California legislature.

[–]luckystar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yeah, I'm in Wiener's district.. have contacted his office before but useless obviously, he's the ringleader of this stuff. There is a challenger this year, further left than him, she could very well agree with the genderspecials too but she hasn't commented either way, so at the very least it's not her top priority.

I agree with your points though. Sad truth is both parties hate women, just in different ways.

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It I were in Scott Wiener's district I would stand outside his office with a sign, "Scott Wiener wants YOU to get HIV"

OK, I'd actually alternate my signs, "Scott Wiener Hates Gay Rights"

"Scott Wiener Wants Rapists In Your Daughter's Bathroom"

And they'd all be true. So bite me, Scott WIENER.

[–]luckystar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sadly the second slogan is the only one that would get traction here.

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Whatever works, right? I think that especially older gay men are getting fed up with the gay orgs focus on the gender people.

But if Wiener had a brain in that grotesque head, he would have figured out that adding "gender identity" to the legal definition of "sex" will make it impossible to define homosexuality, sexual orientation and same-sex attraction, so is actually a blow to gay rights. But if Wiener has proven nothing else, he's proven that he's a complete fucking moron so I don't think he'll ever figure it out. Well, maybe after gay men wake up and go after him.

[–]WrongToy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Look, the more LGB candidates follow or are indebted to the trans view, the more that people will assume all lgb candidates are of that view. Until more come out against the trans view--and this is terrible--I have to assume their default is the trans view if they say anything remotely lgbt. Or have pronouns. Sorry,

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the US House of Representatives, the person most responsible for the Equality Act is Congressman David Cicilline (D-Rhode Island) He is a gay man, a lawyer and an LGBTQ+++ advocate.

In the US Senate, open lesbian Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin), also a lawyer, is one of the key players pushing the Equality Act.

What part of the fact that the Equality Act also destroys gay rights do these two openly gay politicians not get?

By changing the legal definition of "sex" to include "gender identity" the Equality Act that these two gays are passionately advocating for screws gay people for the same reason it screws women. Without a clear cut definition of sex it is impossible to define "homosexual" "sexual orientation" or "same-sex attraction" and, like the laws protecting women, the laws protecting gays on "the basis of sex" will be thrown into limbo if the Equality Act becomes law.

Which leads me to believe that both David Cicilline and Tammy Baldwin are complete fucking morons.

Tammy Baldwin is a super-extra moron because she claims to be a feminist, so is not only screwing lesbians via the Equality Act, she's screwing all women.

[–]davids877 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Looks like US 101 Northbound from SFO(The Airport) at about South Airport Blvd.

[–]WrongToy 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

HA HA HA. That is not in San Francisco. That is in South San Francisco, a completely different county with much more balanced views on things.

The chances that they'll get it torn down went from maybe 25 percent to 5 percent on that alone.

Thanks for the info!

[–]buttbuttinator 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ah, too bad. As WrongToy mentioned that's South San Francisco which is a different (but adjacent) city altogether. I won't be passing that way, but hopefully that means it'll stand for longer and more international travelers will see it on their way from the airport. My mom will be going by there later this week too, so now I'm a little worried that she'll be the one who reports it. Maybe I should make sure that she hears the non TRA side before she sees the billboard.

[–]WrongToy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every commuter that doesn't take 280 will see it actually including all the peeps who clog the freeway from SF to Silicon Valley every day. it's really a primo location.

[–]Overdrive 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I swear to god if your ma gets it taken down...😅

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is there anywhere we can donate? I really hope Jk Rowling sees these.

[–]divingrightintowork 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Huzzah! I love when the Streisand in effect works in my favor

[–]BEB 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah - I almost hope the gendxr loons try to take down the sign - free publicity for us!

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shared this on ovarit https://www.ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/4490/new-i-love-jk-rowling-billboard-goes-up-in-san-francisco

News coverage someone on ovarit shared discussion

https://adland.tv/adnews/i-j-k-rowling-billboard-appears-san-francisco