you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]our_team_is_winning 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I hate feeling stupid, but when I read legislation stuff, I do feel stupid. So this bill would acknowledge "gender" and self-id as well? And it's only in housing or in everything? Both bills say men can "be" women?

I have Gender Chaos Fatigue.

[–]BEB[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is what the Republican version, called the FAIRNESS FOR ALL Act, of the Equality Act would do - it's the same as the Equality Act in terms of throwing open all women's sex-segregated spaces and sports to men who identify as women.

FAIRNESS FOR ALL

The Fairness for All Act would force individuals and institutions to bow to transgender ideology, threatening privacy, safety, and fairness for women and girls.

Schools, businesses, and other public accommodations would be forced to allow biological males access to women’s restrooms and locker rooms on the basis of self-declared gender identity. This poses a serious risk of abuse by predators.

[–]missdaisycan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yep. Dem Equality Act with a religious exemption. However, it was written so that the courts could strike down the religious exemption and leave the rest as enforceable law. So, it's the Dems bill introduced on the Republican side ( by RINOs - Republican In Name Only)

https://www.heritage.org/religious-liberty/commentary/misguided-fairness-all-act-would-undermine-religious-liberty

[–]LesbiSilly 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck everyone.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ugh, some religions are 'more equal' than others I guess