you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BEB 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

From your lips to the US Democratic party's ears!!!!

[–]our_team_is_winning 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not when Trans Demands are bankrolling them :( Do we have any money paper trail about that? After reading all that Arcus foundation stuff and how the other Trans groups give BIG donations with the provision the recipient sign on to the "inclusivity" crap -- I just assume Elizabeth Warren, for example, was bribed to tell us her pronouns.

[–]BEB 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I know two people who've dealt with Elizabeth Warren (but one a number of hears ago) who say she's a sweet person, and the one from a number of years ago also said that Warren was surprisingly naive.

So Warren maybe just has not taken the time to parse gender ideology and has just gone with the flow - because the transgender activists so successfully grafted themselves to LGB, she might have figured it's all one harmless ideology.

That's my charitable interpretation. My other theory is that Warren, like apparently many other Democrats, received big money from Trans, Inc. That's probably more likely.

[–]OrangeFirefly 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm sure Elizabeth Warren is just naïve. However, this really isn't good enough. People in public office with the power to influence laws need to take the time to understand the arguments on both sides and grasp what changing the law will mean. Naïvete is a terrible trait in a would-be President.