all 38 comments

[–]BewitchedSam 34 insightful - 1 fun34 insightful - 0 fun35 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm a neuropsych major. From what I've learned there is some controversy in the field about this. Some studies have shown that men typically have more grey matter and women have more white matter. However, more recent studies have shown that the distributions overlap and it's not always in predictable ways. There are size differences between male and female brains but research has shown that this corresponds with body sizes. Something to keep in mind is historically brain differences have been used to as a justification for sexism and racism. So I approach such studies with skepticism and try to look for signs of bias on the researchers part.

[–]MezozoicGay 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

From soviet books, I've learned that structural difference there is because in woman head there more different structural parts to control hormones (as their levels and control are much more complex, especially during pregnancy, than men ones). And women themselves are smaller in size on average, and they have different skull structure. So their brains have less space to be placed, and to counter that - their brains have much more grey matter relative to whole mass of brain than man. And on average man and woman of same size should have around same amount of grey matter on average, even thought woman brain will be smaller in size.

I've read some western studies that were proving this point. Or more like, studies were about something else, but experiments proved point I gave above.

Just in addition: Soviet sexism is another topic, and can be very interesting to discuss or study. As everything was made to make "everyone equal" by laws, so technically women here had right to own a land and to vote since 1920 year, however, on practice that almost never ever happened, and no women (except one Lenin friend) were in high levels of power in USSR. So laws and studies by law were equally focused on both sexes, but on practice it was not the case and everything was still heavily aimed on men only.

[–]BewitchedSam 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Very interesting. Based on your comment, I was able to find a study that found that women had more regional GM than men when controlled for brain size. However, most of the articles I've found thus far have suggested women have more WM and men have more GM overall. I also couldn't find anything suggest that the pineal gland was larger in women when controlled for brain size. I'm limited to EBSCO host and Google scholar at the moment and haven't done much digging yet but I'll keep looking.

If sexism and misogyny remained socially acceptable despite the legal equality it's possible these studies could have been influenced by researcher bias.

[–]MezozoicGay 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

could have been influenced by researcher bias.

They could, but for some reason, they are often still "less sexist" than western ones of same time. Most likely because sexism here was based on "classic family values, women and men must do different work" and not on "women are just worse than men".

And do not forget that grey matter can grow in size (or more like in density, not actual square space). So studies during times when women were not allowed to study in universities or to work outside of homes - can actually factually show that women in age of 30-40 had less grey matter, but that was only because they were not allowed to develop, while men were learning whole life. However, I am not sure about this part, as I haven't read any researches for this exact topic about growth, and only saying what we studied in school in USSR.

[–]catawampus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don’t really know anything about this topic, but couldn’t the way we are socialized and respond to our environment affect how our brains develop i.e. neural plasticity?

[–]BewitchedSam 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes our brains change based on our environment and events but this would contribute to individual differences and not average differences between sexes.

[–]MarkTwainiac 28 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 0 fun29 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I've no problem with the idea that there are myriad physical differences between the two sexes apart from our sex organs. After all, every cell in our bodies contains our sex chromosomes. So to me it doesn't seem surprising that male & females have different skeletons, levels of bone density, skull thickness, heart & lung capacity, levels of blood oxygenation, immune responses and so on... Nor does it surprise me that evidence is emerging that a number of non-sexed organs such as the kidneys & liver function differently in the two sexes. As a result, I'm open to the possibility that there might be some sex differences in the brain, too.

What I don't give credence to is the idea - which Soh promotes - that if it can be shown there are appreciable differences in male & female brains (which IMO at this point in time remains a very big IF) then this means a) all these differences are inherent & present from birth, and b) these (relatively small) differences cause male & female brains to function in entirely different ways & are the principal reason that some males & some females display behaviors, interests, personal style & grooming preferences that conform to rigid sex stereotypes of masculinity & femininity.

Soh & other sexist genderists like her think that it's natural & innate for males to be "masculine" & females to be "feminine" - and they further believe that the way "masculine" and "feminine" are defined in Western culture in 2020 is the way "masculine" & "feminine" have always been defined in all cultures throughout human history.

The brain scans that Soh focuses on & makes such a big deal of were all done on adults, & very small numbers of adults too. The only way scientists can determine if there actually are significant brain differences in males & females would be to do brain scans of large numbers of people in tightly controlled groups from the day of birth (or before), then to repeat the scans on a regular & frequent basis throughout the course of the subjects' entire lives. And all the while, all the other myriad forces potentially impacting the brain - socialization, trauma, illness, hormone levels, etc - would have to be carefully monitored, documented and taken into account.

BTW, I pre-ordered Soh's book, and approached it with an open mind. But I found it to be very badly written, poorly reasoned & quite confused. Her POV struck me as incredibly sexist, classist, ageist, solipsistic, myopic, contradictory & muddled.

The book is full of errors & outrageous, untrue assertions such as "no one is 100% male or 100% female." Throughout she confuses gender with sex, and masculinity & femininity with male & female.

Soh also doesn't seem to know anything beyond her narrow field, and is not well-versed - or at all versed - in such topics as history, anthropology, psychology, child development, various religions or feminism. I got the impression she has never travelled outside North America, considered other cultures or historical eras, or spoken to many (or any) women who are different to her in terms of age, education, upbringing, country of origin, life experience, etc. She particularly seems to have a low opinion of - indeed, a loathing for - women who've carried pregnancies to term & given birth.

[–]BEB 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Soh has been on Joe Rogan (I know, I know) at least two times, including doing publicity for her latest book. Those are long interviews, if you want to hear more of what she has to say.

I have only seen a bit of her Rogan interviews and read her articles, and I feel that she seems a bit of the Pick Me and I'm- A-Hot-Cool-Smart-Girl type, i.e., she seems to want to appeal to the menz so straddles the feminist borderline. IMO she also wants to create a little controversy in a self-promoting type of way.

However, other people think she's a guru, and she's very intelligent (edited to say that "I've read that she's very intelligent") so, for me, I need to read more of her work.

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I'd seen Soh on Rogan & other platforms previously, & though I found her muddled then, I was willing to credit her with being very intelligent, which is why I pre-ordered her book. But the book did not strike me as the work of someone of great intelligence. Nor does it offer any new info or insight about her own field or about the controversies over gender/sex more generally.

Also, whilst she concedes & documents the very real threats to girls & women's safety, dignity, privacy & peace of mind that have been, and will be, caused by allowing males into female spaces, this is what she concludes (page 208):

Ultimately, I believe in live and let live. If a transgender individual is in the presence of someone who appears to be uncomfortable, whether it's in a bathroom, locker room, or shelter, let it be up to the trans person to decide what's appropriate.

This strikes me as a TIM supremacist position.

[–]BEB 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

OMG, that Soh quote!

"Live and let live" except if you're a woman. She's a Men's Rights Activist in GC-lite clothing, as I suspected.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

She’s not GC if she thinks gender is innate. She’s TRA lite.

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Soh is not at all GC. She believes gender is innate, is very anti-feminist, & embraces all sorts of regressive sexist stereotypes. Says in her book all females except for super-butch lesbians have a natural liking for long hair & being "pink princesses;" that enjoying "talking on the phone" & TV talk shows are female traits; and it's abnormal for boys to like & collect stuffed animals & other plush toys & to take ballet lessons.

By Soh's reckoning, Alexander Graham Bell, Mark Twain*, Steve Jobs, Dick Cavett, Johnny Carson, William F Buckley, David Lettermen, Jimmy Kimmel, Theodore Roosevelt, A.A. Milne, Jim Henson, Seth McFarlane, Mark Wahlberg, Mikael Baryshnikov, Patrick Swayze, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Tupac Shakur, Mads Mikkelsen, Jamie Bell, Christian Bale & tons of other men who were into chatting on phones, TV talk shows, plush toys, teddy bears & stuffed animals, and/or ballet were/are somehow "feminine" & probably gay. When, in fact, AFAIK all the men I just listed are/were straight, and all except Seth McFarlane & Tupac married women & fathered children.

*In case people don't know: Mark Twain was one of the first private citizens in the world to have a telephone. He had one installed in his home in CT in 1877, shortly after Alexander Graham Bell first demoed the invention. Later he famously complained there was no night phone service where he lived, & that operators frequently cut him off when he used his phone, as he habitually did, to practice saying swear words.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She sounds like an idiot. She’s definitely TRA lite. so women in countries that still don’t have access to telephones or TV aren’t women?

The bigger question I have is why do we keep mentioning her and talking about her if she isn’t GC? Sounds like a nobody really.

[–]SameOldBS 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't think she came across as particularly bright in any of the interviews I've watched with her. Just not very intellectually vigorous.

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was my impression from seeing her in interviews & a couple of on-stage "debate" type events. But since I kept hearing about how smart she was, and about her being a PhD & a "scientist," I thought perhaps I'd just seen her on her bad days - or there was something I wasn't getting. So I pre-ordered her book. Reading it left me underwhelmed. She certainly lacks intellectual rigor, is confused & confusing, & a terrible writer.

[–]SameOldBS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes! I've watched her too and thought she had exactly that vibe.

[–]artetolife 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No. If it was that easy then trans can just go for a scan and get approved for transition, but that's not what happens.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nope. That logic doesn't work unless you also believe in the born in the wrong body stuff which isn't part of the question.

[–]lefterfield 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can't tell a male from a female by looking at brain scans. So I don't know what this "scientist" means by different brains.

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Masculinity is already seen as the gold standard.

[–]itsnotaboutewe 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Males and females of most species exhibit different behaviours according to their sex but that doesn't mean their brains are different. It is their hormones and millions of years of instinctive learning that each sex has that makes them act differently. For instance, in some birds it is the male that builds the nest so the females have no nest building urge. The female inspects the nest and either approves of it or goes in search of a male with better skills, but that doesn't mean their brains are different. It means that the sexes have different roles to play in procreation and they act upon that. Penguins have similar roles between the sexes and it is only the actual mating and egg laying that sets the sex roles apart. There have been many instances of two penguin males raising a chick but they have to be given or steal an egg and there is no evidence to suggest they are homosexual, just that they both think the other is to play the female sex role. Their sex roles after the laying of an egg is the same for a male or female.

Dr Soh also believes in gender as being linked to these sex roles, but if that is the case it would mean every animal has a gender, which I reject. I consider gender to be a social construct totally separate to sex roles, which are innate. I breed sheep and I know that ewes and rams have different roles in the flock which are dependent on their sex. A ram will change his role in the flock if I castrate him but he will not turn into a ewe or have a ewe's brain. He will still be male with a male brain but his sex role has changed so his behaviour changes accordingly.

[–]MezozoicGay 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Main confusions with gender are because gender was alway a synonymous to sex. And in majority of languages there no separate word for "gender" and only words for biological sex. So for non-native English speaker, or to people grown up in different cultures, the whole idea of gender at all is very weird, and many countries are not even recognizing the differences in translations (for example, in Istanbul Convention there stated "gender" and "sex" as different words with different meanings, but in ukrainian translations of that, they both were translated as "biological sex" until recently, so our politicians were not able to spot what can be wrong with Convention).

This means that majority of non-native English speakers, who are not really aware about TRA wars, would consider gender as something synonymous or very close to biological sex, and translate both words as "biological sex".

And in gendered languages neo-pronouns makes no sense as well, because every word is gendered, not pronoun. So to add new pronoun, half of words must be changed, what can take years for every pronoun.

[–]purrfect 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't dislike Debra Soh, but after watching a few interviews, I don't find her particularly clear about concepts and what she means. She often mixes up gender and sex and I keep correcting her in my mind, until I get confused myself.

Anyway, you ask: shouldn't a neuroscientist know this? I've followed a few neuroscientists with all kind of points of view and I suspect many of them are afraid of saying out loud stuff that could justify certain attitudes and also some fear cancellation. It's dangerous territory, whether we like it or not. So here it goes:

  • On average, male and female brains differ slightly in size and structurally. It makes sense, because one sex is usually bigger than the other and have different sex organs and hormone production. The key words here are "on average". I remember one neuroscientist saying, that if they had nothing but the brain (and before doing any genetic test to confirm), they'd still be capable of guessing if it belonged to a male or a female at high rates, but not always, because there are "overlapping brains". This definitely doesn't mean there are cognitive differences, because there aren't any, according to studies.

  • Innate gendered behavior: I believe some of it is innate on average (magical words!). I think most animals have it, too: mating rituals, offspring rearing, etc... For instance, do I think violence is gendered? Yes, I do. Most men have a greater tendency to violence than women, although that doesn't mean there aren't meek men or violent women. I mean, men's skeletal structure is built for fighting. So no, I don't believe all of the gender roles are cultural, but I do think the great majority of them are.

  • I think Debra Soh has tunnel vision. She admitted she doesn't like feminists, because some tried to suppress and deny research in this field, so scientists had to walk on eggshells. She has some undeniable resentment and bias, even if she makes some good points. She also has a tendency to try and shield herself from accusations of transphobia with constant assertions that transitioning in adulthood can be beneficial. It's not going to work, Debra!

  • I think much more research is needed. And I mean research that isn't censored or even self censored. The more studies we have about this, the better. I'd rather have the truth and work from that.

[–]MezozoicGay 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

She often mixes up gender and sex and I keep correcting her in my mind, until I get confused myself.

I said about the confusion here: https://saidit.net/s/GenderCritical/comments/67pv/do_you_guys_think_men_and_women_have_different/o4qe

And in general, all this genderqueer "renaming" of words and giving to words new meanings is confusing on itself, even for English speakers. And even more confusing for someone from different culture or with different native language, where such concept does not exist at all.

all of the gender roles are cultural, but I do think the great majority of them are.

Gender roles are cultural, gender behavior - not always.

It's not going to work, Debra

Many people still seems can't realize that gender ideologists does not want "a bit", they want everything. That it is never enough for them.

[–]SameOldBS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, I was getting frustrated with that mixing up sex and gender thing too when I watched her. I kept thinking it must be me because she's the sex researcher.

[–]eddyelric[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK, that makes sense. The resentment from not being able to do proper research would leave a mark. Thank you for elaborating on this.

[–]anxietyaccount8 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Radical feminists believe that the majority of gendered brain differences are because of nurture. Ms. Soh is not really part of the gender critical movement. I don't know why I'm seeing GC people on Twitter support her.

[–]Terfenclaw 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think there are slight differences on the population level that are meaningless at the individual level, and these get overemphasized.

[–]MezozoicGay 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I haven't read book completely, but on all podcasts I saw she was saying that it is brain reactions that are different, not brains themselves. And that it can be spotted if a person is homosexual by showing them hot pictures of different sexes by reaction in their brain on those pictures, while brains themselves are the same (what makes sense, as homosexuality is inherent, so gay man reacting on hot men same as straight man reacting on hot women is logical conclusion even without brain scans). And she is saying that so far there no possibility to find transgendor like that, as most their reactions are the same as they are supposed to be of their original sex. However, people still can take this as "brains are different, or why they have different reactions?!" and weaponize.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes and no. I don't think that gender is entirely a social construct because there are definitely biological elements to it. Take young children for example, they will play, develop and pick up on social cues in different ways depending on whether they are male or female. For instance, I don't think it's plausible that there is a social reason why female babies cry more than male babies, or why girls develop fine motor skills when boys are developing gross motor skills, or why girls prefer playing with dolls and boys prefer rough and tumble play. However, what is harder to determine is whether those differences are created by an inherently different female / male brain or something else, like hormones in the womb or whatever. Some of the cases of surgery on cloacal extrophy kids (basically giving them cross sex surgery because they had some sort of birth defect) and the kids would grow up to be male despite being raised as female. So I think there is something innate about 'gender'. There also seem to be different reactions to different stimuli in brains based upon whether someone is male and female. Interestingly the study on transgender women that showed reactions that were somewhere between men and women, however it's debated whether this is just what the brains of gay men would look like (because their brains also look a bit like women's).

Nonetheless, I think a lot of this stuff often gets way overstated and used to justify sexist beliefs. Statistically speaking men and women have pretty similar abilities, so it is hard to tell how much difference between them is nature vs nurture. I also think it's hard to tell whether the above described is due to 'brain sex', or due to hormones, or social development. I think the brain differences get overstated too, for example there is more difference between an autistic brain and a non-autistic brain, and between and violinist's brain and a pianists brain than a male and female brain.

Disclaimer: I have learnt what I know from google, I don't have a science degree.

[–]BewitchedSam 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You brought up a lot of excellent points. I'm not familiar with the cloacal entropy cases but I remember the case of David Reimer was similar. He suffered a botched circumcision as an infant and the doctors involved decided to preform SRS on him and have his parents raise him as a girl. He ended up being the focus of an experiment on nature vs nuture and to see if gender was inate. Reimer reported being unhappy as a girl and began suspecting he was a boy around 10 and at 15 he was told the truth and detransitioned. Unfortunately, the damage was irrevocable and he suffered from mental health issues before taking his own life in his 30s.

I also agree that a lot of this gets overstated. There's an issue in psychology (maybe in other fields as well) where if research results fail to have significant findings they don't get published. This is called the file drawer problem. So while a few studies have found differences we have no idea how many have found similarities. It also contributes to an issue called P-Hacking in which researchers manipulate their data to make it look like they found something they didn't so they will get published.

I think it's something that still needs to be studied and explored. But that won't happen in the current political climate in academia.

[–]MezozoicGay 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That experiment proved nothing, thought. Having body parts removed, bleeding all the time from wounds, taking hormonal blockers and taking different hormones (estrogen, so not even main women hormones - progesterones), is absolutely different to being a girl and growing up as a girl. Especially when not completely isolated from society.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

cloacal entropy

Sorry that should be cloacal exstrophy. I read about these in the book 'the man who would be queen' you can read a copy here. The TRAs were fuming over the book and basically had it banned because it is inline with the HSTS / AGP theory so I read it to spite them lol.

[–]CleverNickName 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Also, even if you scan 7 billion brains, and 99% of women's brains match with each other, and then you find 1% of WomanBrain™ in men

would that really change anything? It wouldn't make the men women, any more than whatever other biological irregularities human bodies throw at men and women.

Women tend to generally be a few centimeters shorter than men (global average of 7% acc. to a quick google). Tall women aren't men, or even masculine. They're not transmen. What if it turns out all tall women have ManBrain™?? Is my mom my dad???

[–]SameOldBS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Didn't someone take MRI scans of men and women solving a problem, and men's brains lit up in just one area and women's brains lit up in lots of different areas? Or have I misremembered?

[–]lestratege 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here is a presentation about brain differences in the brain. Click Cc for English subs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXUS0MRcFWM

[–]fuckingsealions 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She gives me spectrum vibes, Wich can make some people very tunnel-visioned.