Senator Wiener of California...Some people say it's pushing for legalizing sex with minors as long as you are not over 10 years older than the minor.. Read the bill

submitted by joeytundra from leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]joeytundra[S] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It's legit and this senator is putting it back up. He's also claiming it somehow discriminates against the LGBT? https://www.dlawgroup.com/california-senate-bill-145-misguided/

[–][deleted] 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

holy shit this is a mess and one fucked up perspective...

The issue in question concerns how the law views different types of sex crimes involving minors. Under existing law, illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age do not automatically require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry if the offense in question involves vaginal intercourse

So because we let men have "dubious consensual sex" with female children, we have to open the door to everyone? holy hot shit, a 24 year old and a 15 isn't necessarily assumed wrong or illegal? never moving to California. Knowing this, it really sets the perspective that they are working towards making pedophilia legal, or at least, less punished.

**Edit "disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse" There's a B and an L in that acronym. T doesn’t describe what parts they have or how theyre using them. The laws talk about sexual penetration, not intercourse. why is he referring to a law about having sex with children as intercourse?

[–]slushpilot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

penetration, not intercourse. why is he referring to a law about having sex with children as intercourse

Good point, "inter-" implies a mutual exchange.

[–]MurkyMilk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Intercourse" is just a dry, technical sounding term for "sex". 15-year-olds certainly do this, as much as we hate it.

[–]slushpilot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, when they are close to the same age of course. Otherwise it's not really mutual because of the age/power dynamic, and using that word is implying the wrong thing. It's a euphemism trying to hide the nature of the relationship.

[–]MurkyMilk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, but "intercourse" implies nothing beyond PIV and some movement. It doesn't imply anything about age or consent or anything else. It's a word that can be used when someone has sex with a horse. So your concern is unwarranted here.