you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Lilith_Fair 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not sure about that. The SA population is too small, or maybe nonexistent, to make a difference in the swing states that will determine the vote. However flawed she is as the representative for the black voters, she was chosen as a symbolic nod to pander to the black vote. Also, they might be thinking she'll do a good job in the traditional VP role of an attack dog. And here I must say, when the VP candidate is a woman, the VP as attack dog strategy doesn't work and more than likely will backfire. But despite that strategy keeps failing, for some reason the campaign experts can't see that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There were other black women candidates. South Asians might be small but they have a lot of money and usually live in swing states that could determine the elections. Trump won on razor thin margins. I don’t think the democrats want to lose those margins. And Kamala Harris might identify as black but she was solely raise by her hindu single mother. South Asians take note of that. From what I understand, there are 500,000 Indians living in those swing states that can vote.