you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkTwainiac 41 insightful - 8 fun41 insightful - 7 fun42 insightful - 8 fun -  (1 child)

The look of one's body does not imbibe it with identity

Imbibe? Imbibe means to drink. Does he mean imbue or endow? What a moron.

Having a vagina that appears and functions more similar to a strap-on sex toy is not a valid and substantiated reasoning for being body shamed.

I'll skip over the author's further misuse of words and just go to my basic reaction: WTF? Yeah, there are strap-on dicks and fake vulvas because dicks and vulvas are both external organs... but what the hell is a strap-on vagina?

How does one strap on an internal organ? Clearly this idiot is clueless about the defining properties and core functions of a vagina.

As to the rest: no one is "shaming" or "discriminating against" men for not having vaginas. Women and men with a grasp of reality are simply saying that males who have fantasies, fetishes and wishes about having female bodies do not actually have or acquire female bodies no matter how much mental gymnastics they do.

[–]chrysthefeminist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

but what the hell is a strap-on vagina?

LOL! It's sort of like a "birth father." (what the judge in the Baby M case called the baby's genetic father, William Stern.)