you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Shinjin_Nana 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I can understand both sides, I also feel it's patronizing tokenism but also want more qualified women in positions of power.

That said Biden's TWAW stance would mean that she would have to be a handmaiden for TRAs and toe the progressive anti-biological woman line. I like this less than picking someone of either sex with a feminist leaning.

Full disclosure: I have no plans of voting for Biden or Trump.

[–]Lucretia 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Then you ARE voting for Trump. Make no frigging mistake.

[–]medium_tomato[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

And that attitude is how you will eventually vote to lose all of your rights and all the protections women fought for before you.

[–]Shinjin_Nana 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Srsly. How are GC women supposed to vote when both sides have put a target on us.

Either way we lose.

[–]whateverneverpine 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not true.

[–]Shinjin_Nana 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I find that to be a compelling argument that will change many minds. Bravo for being so succinct in your profound intellectual brevity.

[–]whateverneverpine 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

More dazzling succinctness: LOL.