you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]greenish 76 insightful - 2 fun76 insightful - 1 fun77 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

This is good, I hope it goes through, in this and other sports.

But notice how they refer to females as "ciswomen" and males as "males".

[–]Killer_Danish 49 insightful - 3 fun49 insightful - 2 fun50 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Truth. Men don't get called "penis-havers" or "ejaculators" or "testicle-owners"... Almost like men don't have to kowtow to the trans-cult or something...

[–]Aquadog 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

PoP-People of Penis.

[–]catoboros 33 insightful - 3 fun33 insightful - 2 fun34 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

In the last paragraph, the article inconsistently refers to trans men as trans males in comparison to males. Trans men are female, of course. This confusion is another consequence of the linguistic muddle promoted by TRAs in an attempt erase any language that might contradict them. Newspeak, anyone?

[–]yishengqingwa666 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They have stolen women's words, the words we use to define ourselves.

[–]Veneficca 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And notice the headline. Not "Women face safety concerns" but "Trans women face potential ban." Shows what's more important - hurt trans feelings compared to broken bones and ruptured spleens.