you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OrneryStruggle 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I mean, Twitter did literally go out of their way to change their policies to explicitly allow pedophilia talk and communities on their platform, and yes, many of those people are TRAs pretty publicly. It's hard to deny at this point.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

When did they do that? I haven’t really paid much attention to Twitter in the past.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

' Big League Politics discovered a little-noticed, quietly enacted Twitter rule change from March, which says “Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.” '

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/11/26/twitter-allows-pedophiles-to-discuss-attraction-to-minors/

[–]OrneryStruggle 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't recall when exactly, but if you read their TOS/rules it's actually explicit in the rules. They have a specific section of their rules that's all about which pedophilia content is allowed.

But women are not allowed to call TIMs by male pronouns or they will have their accounts deleted.