all 2 comments

[–]zephyranthes 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Suzanne Moore is a phony.

Now we have Damian Barr making sure Emma Nicholson, who held an honorary position on the Booker Prize Committee, is booted off for her views on same sex marriage and some terrible tweets about trans people.

The "her views on same sex marriage" is a link. It explains that Emma Nicholson voted against same-sex marriage, which she did (in 2013). That link, in turn, links to Penis News, who lambaste Nicholson for saying same-sex marriage will degrade the rights of girls and women, as well as telling the truth and calling to investigate govt-sponsored TRA child grooming.

It is 2020 now, and it turns out Nicholson was right about same-sex marriage. It is pointless and harmful to ascribe motives to her 2013 prediction, because she was right.

If anything, if it were homophobia, Bayesian reasoning suggests we should all become a little more homophobic, in order to be right more often. But she might have realized the thinktank apparatus of the gay marriage movement would be looking for a new reason to exist and continue to be funded instead of celebrating and winding down, and she might have seen future married gay men engaging in human trafficking in order to produce "their own" children. And guess what? I google "commercial surrogacy uk", intentionally with ads unblocked, and get two international slave trade ads with UK phone numbers above the first link. If you're wondering, a human costs €39.9K.

The "terrible tweets about trans people" part is not sourced. Googling, I find Nicholson tweeted about Munroe Bergdorf - not "trans people", but specifically him. Munroe is, of course, a woman-hater ("how's your barren womb"), an equal opportunity homophobe ("hairy lesbians", "gays and their flapping arms"), and a child groomer.

Suzanne Moore might be writing what she does "to survive", a.k.a. to keep her job. Perhaps she's secretly gender critical and thinks she's doing good by reaching the general public this way. Taken at face value, it's spineless.

And there's no compromising with TRAs. The acceptable amount of girldick a woman should be forced to suck is none.

[–]Anna_Nym 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think it's fair to say Baroness Nicholson was right about same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage is not the problem. It's the capture of LGB institutions by trans activism and the Tumblr-influenced cancel culture.

I am glad we have same-sex marriage, and I don't believe that there is a conflict between legal same-sex marriage and advocating for women's rights. Indeed, lesbians were the canary in the coal mine about where TRA activism was heading.

I don't even think there's an inherent conflict between actual trans rights and women's rights. I think with proper gatekeeping and reality-based definitions, trans people can have equal rights. They just can't have superior rights.