all 17 comments

[–]Doe_aFemaleDeer 26 insightful - 3 fun26 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

high standards for natal women

It's ok to say "real women". All women/females are "natal" - there's no other way to become a woman/female.

[–]Questionings[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's just my way of distinguishing between transwomen and women. The word natal just reinforces the difference implying that one is natural while the other is not

[–]Doorknob8 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The other one is not even a woman. So no need to specify beyond that: woman.

[–]Questionings[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To me it would look odd if I wrote transwomen and then women e.g, transwomen are different from women. It's not that big of a deal, and someone already pointed it out to me. You get the point of what I was saying.

[–]Syphii 19 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Men might have high standards when it comes to who they date/marry, but they have practically zero standards for who they will have sex with. Hence, 'doesn't matter, had sex' meme.

[–]motionlessoracle 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hear hear.

Also, a lot of wokebros are appallingly bad at recognizing when a feminine presenting person is really male (and vice versa). They get totally fooled by the signifiers: the long hair, the makeup, the clothing. It's like they do not recognize facial structure or anatomy.

[–]BarleySammich 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Fuckin can’t stand wokebros. At least standard-issue assholes are upfront about who they are so you know what you’re dealing with. Wokebros are creepy “feminist” predators.

[–]Lilith_Fair 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The standard-issue assholes would even make themselves useful once in a while like fix the car or household appliances or something. The wokebros can't do squat because they're so woke they don't know how to or won't do anything around the house except maybe trim their beards so the women in their lives have to do everything. Meanwhile they're no less misogynistic.

[–]BarleySammich 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So true.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A wokebro is just a niceguy who read a book.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. How about they advocate for trans rights by actively and openly dating TIMs? Until then they can take their "idealism" and 🤬.

[–]Lilith_Fair 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. They can say TWAW all they want but until they date sleep with a TIM, they have no credibility and I don't give a shit what they say. Daniel Radcliff can STFU until he gets himself a TIM girlfriend.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They only espouse “liberal” ideas when it comes to pornography and personal profit.

[–]Eurowoman24 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

right there with you sister. I know that most would especially not date/have sex with one who still had a penis. But oh TWAW right? I think most women can spot TiMs pretty easily since it's very rare for one to be able to completely pass whereas men see makeup, hair, tits. It'll be hilarious seeing the reaction once they're pressured to date them.

[–]Coconaut 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

male feminists. "it costs us nothing to give people the decency to live their lives." costs nothing if you are a hetero man. for any other group, "trans rights" come at a cost of spaces that other marginalized groups have fought for over a 100 years. I'm talking to you, Daniel Radcliffe.

[–]venecia 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

why would they have an issue for a man that thinks all he needs is to slap on a wig and some earrings into order to be a woman?

They can't fault a brother for wanting to get in on that sweet, sweet female privilege. And then they're super devastated when no women want to date them and can blame transphobia lol

[–]Riothamus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The good news is that you're overestimating how many liberal men support this trans BS. I assure you it is nowhere near a majority, just some loud narcissistic assholes who want to look more-progressive-than-thou on social media.

The bad news is that the liberal men who don't go along with transgenderism give it zero thought as it doesn't directly affect them. At least they flip their shit when they see men compete in women's sports. Many men remember being pretty good at certain sports in high school and unknowingly beating the girls' national records while placing competitively-but-not-elite in their events. As a scrawny 17-year-old I beat the girls' then-record in the 5k and didn't even realize it til my time was tied by a girl five years later. I got 25th that race in a state qualifying meet. We REALLY don't like seeing Richard Dolezals screw girls out of scholarships by putting in mediocre male performances in girls' races.