First, Jessica Jonathan Yaniv is their full legal name just to get that out of the way.
They identified as trans and as such went to 16 women's salons and businesses to get their male parts waxed. They then filed a complaint. They went to the hearings claiming they were intersex and that they wanted a vulva waxed.
Yup.
He had to pay those women, not because the BCHRT was that offended by what had happened, but he made several racial slurs that infuriated the tribunal. Their decision is here: http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/shareddocs/decisions/2019/nov/244_Yaniv_v_Various_Waxing_Salons_No_3_2019_BCHRT_244.pdf
Before that, the pub ban was removed, which brought on new onslaughters like Blaire White. Blaire's livestream has 2.1M views and at about 59:00 you can see what actually got JY convicted. Not the sexting charges and hopefully not! behavior that has been going on, but discharging a prohibited weapon on a livestream. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnhnShhxfhQ
So anyways since all that he's been kinda meandering around TikTok showing his parts. KF has the proof that he uh has an anatomically typical one. It is rather small but otherwise typical. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jonathan-yaniv-jessica-yaniv-trustednerd-trustednerd-com-jy-knows-it-jy-british-columbia.49790/page-870
JY was convicted on the prohibited weapons charge. The court mandated a psych exam prior to sentencing, which has been put off because of the coronavirus. More updates can be found at jymeowmix.wordpress.com.
To this day, videos from underage-dominant platforms, such as TikTok, suggest that JY is still flashing themselves and sharing tampon stories with young women and realistically underage girls.
They still have a platform on Twitter. FB. This person now has at least two child files open on him and one is out of Washington state. They have almost a decade--or maybe more--grooming girls or very young women. They have a criminal conviction for weapons. Their ballwaxing case was rejected in toto by the tribunal.
But we are called upon to call this person a "she." We are told that we shouldn't have an issue in the bathroom with them. And if we don't, it's hate speech and they get to stay while we must go.
Just no to that.
[–]slushpilot 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]WrongToy[S] 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]FlickingMarvellous 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]slushpilot 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Anonimouse 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]weirdthorn 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Realwoman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]flowmetry 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]WrongToy[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)