you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iDontShift 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

money laundering

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That's ... that's actually kind of ingenuous. Except now everyone sees it. Wait ... is that a better explanation for the suspected pedo company with shower curtains (with names matching missing children) for ridiculous prices?

[–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

the fact those shower curtains were named after missing kids..

pretty much seals the deal on those pedo curtains as being just that.

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I too, find that persuasive. But I don't have evidence either way. The company said it was coincidences and snopes tried to argue (without anything more than anecdotal evidence) that it was likely to happen with various proper nouns. We need a linguist and a statistician who have teamed up to find the odds of this kind of stuff.

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

there is literally no possible explanation I would accept at this point.

insanely overpriced shit with names of missing kids? and not just a few..

not like these fuckers gonna own up to it.