You initially said

I disagree with the one about not allowing your kid to wear clothes of the opposite gender.

Which prompted me to ask

Can you point to the part in the SEGM report and/or the NHS [guidance] where they mention not allowing your kid to wear clothes of the opposite gender. Coz I missed it.

To which you have now responded,

According to Daily Mail, the new NHS draft guidelines will also discourage the act of children dressing in clothes of the opposite sex.

Huh? Since when can a story in the Daily Mail be taken as an accurate reflection of what the NHS guidance the SEGM report say?

I asked if you have read the interim Cass report. In response you say

I just googled this as I've never heard of it and while I didn't read the entire report I did read the summary of key points.

No offense, but if you've never heard of the Cass investigation, the Cass report and can't be bothered even to read the interim Cass report in its entirety, then you're just admitting that you are very poorly informed about the issues around "child transition" and aren't curious, interested or caring enough about the unfortunate kids being sucked into gender ideology and being egregiously abused by adults in the pursuit of "child transition" to become fully informed.

You initially said

I also disagree with the advice about not allowing kids to socially transition. Unlike medical interventions, pronouns and identities are not permanent.

In response, I gave a long thoughtful comment illustrating that, as the Cass report says, "socially transitioning" of children is "not a neutral act." Rather it's an act that locks kids into a claimed gender identity at a very early age and makes it very difficult for those kids to desist, dial back and reverse course.

But instead of addressing any of the points I raised about children who are socially transitioned when they are toddlers and very young kids years before puberty of adolescence, you come back with

I personally think when you become an adult you are personally responsible for yourself and who you have contact with.

WTF? What does your view about adults have to do with the pre-pubescent children and minor age adolescents under discussion and at issue here? These kids are all living either in their parents' homes or in state care. They have no choice about who they have contact with. Why are you making it seem that toddlers, pre-schoolers, kids in primary school and young adolescents should be considered just as "personally responsible" for themselves and who they have contact with as full-grown adults?

You deny what is happening, and has happened, to vulnerable children transitioned by their parents by dismissing what I said about the youngsters whom I mentioned by name out of hand as though I what I said has so little merit that it's not worth addressing. Instead, without any evidence you blithely assert

What is more likely to happen is parents are not accepting of their childs trans identity

Then you go on to deny that children transitioned by their parents and the other important adult authority figures in their lives are under any pressure to continue identifying as trans in order to please their parents and the other adults who are invested in these kids claiming to be trans.

That's not hat happens. If you want to stop identifying as trans, go ahead.

How on earth can Kai Shappley at age 11 stop identifying as trans when Kai's entire social identity and Kai's mother's whole life, social identity, social standing and job are based on her being the mother of a "trans child"? Kim Shappley, Kai's mom, has been very open about how starting when Kai was 18 months old, she spent several years repeatedly hitting, yelling at, punishing, praying over, shaming and depriving Kai for liking "girl toys" and "girl clothes" and for "acting girly." Because Kim S is a right-wing Christian fundamentalist and raging homophobe who feared that her toddler son's tastes and behavior indicated he might grow up to be gay - a prospect that filled homophobe mom with horror and panic over what others might think about her.

Now Kim works as a paid "gender activist" who trots Kai around the country and before the cameras so he can be a "trans child" show pony and mouthpiece for canned propaganda written by adult trans activists. How can Kai simply stop identifying as trans now? You really think Kai isn't fully aware that desisting from a trans identity would most likely result in Kai's mom going ballistic and in Kai being beaten, shamed, punished, bullied and deprived by mum and others in Kai's life all over again?

Your flip, callous attitude and total denial of what is happening, and has happened, to vulnerable children transitioned by their parents is gob-smacking.