you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Oh grow up.

Sorry but I stand by it is doubling down. Happy to dish it but can’t take gentle and correct criticism. Pathetic.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

I edited my comment after acknowledging you were right I was rude. You have literally no ground to stand on here. Drop it.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Grow up. “It still stands” means that despite it being rude you stand by it. That’s how words work.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Grow up

Hah. Ironic.

"It still stands" means despite the fact i was rude with my delivery, the underlying point still stands. That point being you have issues interacting with people without being toxic. The conversation is over, you got your warning, push the envelope and see what happens. Sorry you can't get away with whatever you want anymore.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Sorry you can't get away with whatever you want anymore.

That is not true. I've warned off Houseplant and even deleted her comments before. You could easily verify this by looking at the mod log. In fact, I remember that, as soon as I made you a mod, I had to warm both of you so you stoped arguing.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You could easily verify this by looking at the mod log

Sadly, no one can, because the geniuses behind this website make the log clear beyond 2 months. But regardless, there are plenty of reported and unmoderated clearly rulebreaking comments from her in the reports you ignored. I can link them if you want.

[–]BiologyIsReal 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Then go through my posting history and see by yourself I was never the awful and biased mod that you and QT user think I was. Really, go through the mod mail and you can see that even Porcelain_Quetzal was forced to admit I've been fair after a QT user wrote us to complain about me.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Okay, I get you slapped people on the wrist. But unless you can explain literally ignoring reports about house where she is undeniably breaking rules I don't know what to tell you. Like, you can talk about these things all day, it doesn't change the evidence. House clearly needed more than a slap on the wrist more than half a year ago. You didn't do it. She's been reported so much it's baffling, and it's clear a lot of the lack of qt users you guys have is directly related to her.

Edit

Just looked, Even porcelain herself said she didn't think you were biased in your moderating, but was concerned about the posts being left up.

Second edit, it isn't just you, peaking and porcelain clearly didnt do anything about it either. God only knows why.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Any comment I ignored was because I didn't think it was worth of moderation. You evidently disagree with my criteria, that is all. There are very few spaces where you can question transgederism and I wasn't going to police every wording from GC users just so we have a few more QT users. I stand by my opinion that the lack of QT users is because they are not interested in debating.

Also they are too used to be in a bubble where any question or doubt about transgenderism is treated as heresy and where everyone is forced to use "inclusive" language. Of course they won't like this sub unless we apply the same criteria than elsewhere.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I stand by my opinion that the lack of QT users is because they are not interested in debating.

And i mean that's fine, you're allowed to believe whatever you want. I'm not going to try and change your mind because you clearly had access to all this information and didn't think differently then. But the fact of the matter is house abused your lack of policing to an extreme. I stand by my opinion that primarily she created a toxic environment that the qt posters who WOULD have been interested in posting here didn't want to deal with her being given free reign.

Also they are too used to be in a bubble where any question or doubt about transgenderism is treated as heresy and where everyone is forced to use "inclusive" language. Of course they won't like this sub unless we apply the same criteria than elsewhere.

No group is a monolith, people are unique. You're right that the majority of trans people live in that bubble, but clearly not all of them do because plenty have come and left.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]beris😎[M] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Ban me, I know you will. It’s not a punishment. It’s a great proof of all my criticisms of you.

    You have one criticism of me, and its that I have a grudge against you. It couldnt be that I'm on your ass specifically because over half of the unmoderated reports are of you. Take that in. You are proveably the most toxic person here and the other mods fucking coddled you and I am SINCERELY sorry you let that get to your head. Take 3 days, learn some respect for others and yourself.