you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In an ideal World, we wouldn' t associate with either right wing or left wing since they' re both mysoginistic shits that hate women and they are both responsible fo the state of women' s rights, including abortion.

It doesn' t matter if we stop associating with conservatives anyway, we' re going to be called right wingers regardless of what we do and say. We were called that way before some of us started using conservative platforms, in fact part of the reason why some of us even started was that we were thrown out from "leftist" places and called nazi and alt-righters.

I don' t like associating with right wingers, but I don' t like associating with left wingers just as much nowadays.

On top of that, the USA are not the one and only country in existence: in other countries we are not having the same problems related to reproduction that Americans are having, so whatever issue you have with American GCers associating with conservatives, I don' t see how that should touch upon GCers from other places.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The question was more about whether appearing on such conservative media outlets help conservatives appear more legitimate and thus make them more electable. Is it inefficient activism.

I mean GC activists and viewpoints being used by conservative politicians to increase their electability is an international occurrence.