you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

If you think nobody else here is laughing at you I’ll leave that illusion alive for ya. I’m here to debate, just not silly ideas suggested by men who give marching orders to women then say the women are dishonest and unintelligent for not marching.

Go on, now you demand I treat your post with respect and answer you properly or go away again. Make sure to keep Ignoring everything that sums up why I’m not gonna invest time or effort into giving quality answers to foolish ideas, naturally.

[–]SnowAssMan[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I posted a debate question. You're the only one here not engaging in the debate, favouring ad hominem attacks instead. You're trying to justify your misuse of the debate sub by claiming that I'm giving "marching orders". FYI, "marching orders" don't end in a question mark. No one is forcing you to debate, but if you don't want to debate the question, what are you here for?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That’s perfect, you’re right on cue. Now once more with feeling, babe.

[–]SnowAssMan[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's unnecessary for you to forfeit more than once, babe.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It’s cute how you keep framing things like you won something when you’ve just been sucking down obvious bait and puffing yourself up like a pigeon to someone who is laughing down at you the more you huff.

There’s nothing to forfeit. You and your half baked idea are not a competition or a threat. You are a sideshow who thinks he runs the circus.